Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization

2009-06-20 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Bill Barker" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization - Original Message - From: "Luc Maisonobe" To: "Commons Dev

Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization

2009-06-20 Thread Bill Barker
- Original Message - From: "Luc Maisonobe" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 12:14 PM Subject: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization Hello, I have reviewed the current state of serialization within [math]. It's

Re: [math] reviewing the current state on serialization

2009-06-20 Thread Phil Steitz
Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hello, I have reviewed the current state of serialization within [math]. It's much simpler than before, thanks to Bill's work. I have removed almost everything serializable in ODE as this didn't make sense anymore, except for the step interpolators. Now I'm wondering if we

[math] reviewing the current state on serialization

2009-06-20 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hello, I have reviewed the current state of serialization within [math]. It's much simpler than before, thanks to Bill's work. I have removed almost everything serializable in ODE as this didn't make sense anymore, except for the step interpolators. Now I'm wondering if we should push this a litt