On 9/29/15 2:24 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:58:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
>>> Dear developers,
>>> I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and
>>> algebra.
>>> In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it on
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:58:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
Dear developers,
I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and
algebra.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only
supports
"int" primes, where some "BigInteger"
On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
> Dear developers,
> I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and algebra.
> In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
> "int" primes, where some "BigInteger" would be required when searching
> for large primes.
Dear developers,
I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and algebra.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
"int" primes, where some "BigInteger" would be required when searching
for large primes.
Second fact, for algebra applications, Rings and su
Dear developers,
I see some lacks in commons-math, w.r.t. number theory.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
"int" primes, where some BigInteger can be required when searching for
large primes.
Second fact, algebra applications will prefer Rings and such instead o
