Thanks, Mark, that makes sense!
In that case I will apply all the patches to 1.5 too.
Thanks everyone for helping with this!
Liv
Liviu Tudor
E: liviu.tu...@gmail.com
C: +1 650-2833815 (USA)
M: +44 (0)7591540313 (UK, Europe)
W: http://about.me/liviutudor
Skype: liviutudor
I'm nobody, nobo
On 30/07/2012 22:33, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
>
>> Mark/Gary/Seb,
>>
>> Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
>> these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
>> the pom and also uses Juni
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Mark/Gary/Seb,
>
> Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
> these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
> the pom and also uses Junit 4.10).
>
> So in the light of these, should I:
>
Mark/Gary/Seb,
Just to clarify this: I haven't touched at all the 1.5 branch -- all of
these refer strictly to the 1.6 branch (which uses JDK 1.5 according to
the pom and also uses Junit 4.10).
So in the light of these, should I:
1/ also apply these patches to the 1.5 branch?
2/ downgrade junit
On 30 July 2012 21:16, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 30/07/2012 21:07, Liviu Tudor wrote:
>> * Findbugs: indeed, some of the findbugs warnings are not entirely correct
>> -- and we should probably look at using the Findbugs annotations to
>> manually annotate the ones which we know to actually be false
On 30/07/2012 21:07, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> * Findbugs: indeed, some of the findbugs warnings are not entirely correct
> -- and we should probably look at using the Findbugs annotations to
> manually annotate the ones which we know to actually be false alarms?
> There were also a couple related to pe
Hey Mark,
* I understand about JIRA -- my question was I guess more upon the lines
of should I submit a patch in JIRA (after opening a ticket) and then carry
out the discussion for things like Set vs List there, or is this list a
better place. I understand now that the dev list is better, thank yo
On 30/07/2012 09:36, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Thanks very much for pointing me in the right direction, Mark!
> As with all development tasks, this, however, opened up new questions --
> not entirely sure if these are best discussed on this list or whether
> occasionally I should open up a JIRA ticket f
Thanks very much for pointing me in the right direction, Mark!
As with all development tasks, this, however, opened up new questions --
not entirely sure if these are best discussed on this list or whether
occasionally I should open up a JIRA ticket for this so more than
welcoming suggestions here.
On 24/07/2012 08:42, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Phil & others who have been in touch with [pool],
>
> A follow up to this: I'm trying to log this in JIRA and submit a patch but
> I've come across the following problem:
>
> 1/ The mechanism I am referring to had pool-1.6.0 in mind, however, I
> can't fi
Phil & others who have been in touch with [pool],
A follow up to this: I'm trying to log this in JIRA and submit a patch but
I've come across the following problem:
1/ The mechanism I am referring to had pool-1.6.0 in mind, however, I
can't find in SVN the branch for 1.6? There are release branch
Hi Phil,
Sorry to get onto this so late! I've just checked out the source code in
order to provide a patch at the same time as the JIRA ticket being
created, however, I see [pool] now is moving to pool2 -- my initial
suggestion was based on pool-1.6.0 (which is what I use in my
application).
Are
On 7/10/12 2:51 PM, Liviu Tudor wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question regarding [pool] -- which might turned out to be either a
> request for change or a potential improvement patch (though it could be the
> case I suppose that I've misunderstood certain things, in which case it will
> just turn
Hi guys,
I have a question regarding [pool] -- which might turned out to be either a
request for change or a potential improvement patch (though it could be the
case I suppose that I've misunderstood certain things, in which case it will
just turn out into my wasting people's time -- hopefully not
14 matches
Mail list logo
