On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 11:47:33 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
On Jun 7, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I’m a +0 for not using japicmp because of its issues. We do need
another [parent] release because of the japicmp skip availability
in
0.12.
> On Jun 7, 2018, at 11:26 AM, Gilles wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
>> I’m a +0 for not using japicmp because of its issues. We do need
>> another [parent] release because of the japicmp skip availability in
>> 0.12.0. I’d like to get the [release-plugin] u
On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 10:49:28 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I’m a +0 for not using japicmp because of its issues. We do need
another [parent] release because of the japicmp skip availability in
0.12.0. I’d like to get the [release-plugin] up to snuff before going
out though.
Is [rng] ready to go for
I’m a +0 for not using japicmp because of its issues. We do need another
[parent] release because of the japicmp skip availability in 0.12.0. I’d like
to get the [release-plugin] up to snuff before going out though.
Is [rng] ready to go for 1.1? If so, I can try to roll an RC for you.
-Rob
>
Hello.
The failure is triggered when including the "examples" module.
[Reminder: "japicmp" seems to complain about the absence of an
earlier version.]
Thus, I'm contemplating to release v1.1 without the offending
module. Any objection to my preparing a RC on that basis?
Regards,
Gilles
-
On Tue, 1 May 2018 17:05:23 -0400, Rob Tompkins wrote:
I was starting to fiddle with [parent] version 46 with [rng] and
stumbled across the seemingly legitimate japicmp failure. @Gilles -
any thoughts here? If it is indeed correct I would think those would
be BC incompatible changes between 1.0 a
I was starting to fiddle with [parent] version 46 with [rng] and stumbled
across the seemingly legitimate japicmp failure. @Gilles - any thoughts here?
If it is indeed correct I would think those would be BC incompatible changes
between 1.0 and 1.1.
-Rob
Comparing source compatibility of commo
