Re: AW: [PROPOSAL][test] Apache Commons JUnit

2017-11-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
@Mark: this is already not the case and users are used to gather them putside Junit. Also it is pby as true as saying it would be easier to push commons in openjdk directly no? I see a lot of values to have a uniform backbone - rule API - and making it easy to reuse accross test stacks so commons

Re: AW: [PROPOSAL][test] Apache Commons JUnit

2017-11-05 Thread Mark Fortner
Just out of curiosity, wouldn't it be easier (and more intuitive) for users of JUnit to find a collection of JUnit-related tools on the JUnit project site? Regards, Mark On 5 Nov 2017 11:51 a.m., "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote: > This is a bit different since my case was to

Re: AW: [PROPOSAL][test] Apache Commons JUnit

2017-11-05 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
This is a bit different since my case was to get annoutput of where a test can lock and not a diff. But technically it is close. Le 5 nov. 2017 20:21, "Bernd Eckenfels" a écrit : > Hello, > > > commons-vfs does this (at the Moment it only dumps the threads and does > not

AW: [PROPOSAL][test] Apache Commons JUnit

2017-11-05 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, commons-vfs does this (at the Moment it only dumps the threads and does not break the build) https://github.com/apache/commons-vfs/blob/trunk/commons-vfs2/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/vfs2/test/AbstractTestSuite.java#L213 Gruss Bernd -- http://bernd.eckenfels.net Von: Romain