RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:40 > > 2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter : > >> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the > >> > > > >> > > "package ognl;" > >> > > > >> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use > >> > > > >> > > "p

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter : >> > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the >> > > >> > > "package ognl;" >> > > >> > > declarations, where as the apache releases will use >> > > >> > > "package org.apache.commons.ognl;" >> > > >> > > I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package >> > spa

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:05 > > 2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: sebb > > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > > > > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > > >> -Orig

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron > > -Original Message- > > From: sebb > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: Benedikt Ritter > > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > > >> > > >> Hello J

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: sebb > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 > > On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Benedikt Ritter > >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > >> > >> Hello Jason, > >> > >> sorry, I don't understand wh

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread sebb
On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Benedikt Ritter >> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 >> >> Hello Jason, >> >> sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can >> you give some examples? > > The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 > > Hello Jason, > > sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can > you give some examples? The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the "package ognl;" declarations, where as the apache re

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? Benedikt 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron > > > -Original Message- > > From: Lukasz Lenart > > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > > There are a lot of form

Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
> -Original Message- > From: Lukasz Lenart > Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 > > 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron : > > There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version > in git and apache svn. > > I am still looking for "patches" in git not yet applied to > subversion, > > do y