2014/1/17 Gary Gregory
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>
> > On 2014-01-17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> >
> > > If you build the release from your son's account (or if you have
> > > exotic tastes) you may end up with a 'Build-By: spacepirate' field in
> > > the manifest,
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2014-01-17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> > If you build the release from your son's account (or if you have
> > exotic tastes) you may end up with a 'Build-By: spacepirate' field in
> > the manifest, which is a bit embarrassing.
>
> Now tha
On 2014-01-17, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> If you build the release from your son's account (or if you have
> exotic tastes) you may end up with a 'Build-By: spacepirate' field in
> the manifest, which is a bit embarrassing.
Now that's an idea. So I'll throw in a bit of desinformation with
future re
Le 17/01/2014 14:01, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Well, this must have been that way for all releases I've ever
> created. :-)
>
> If I had the choice I'd rather remove the manifest attribute completely
> than filling it with noise (and yes, I do consider my apache ID noise in
> this case). Why wo
2014/1/17 Stefan Bodewig
> thanks for the review and the vote.
>
> On 2014-01-17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> > One minor thing I've noticed is, that the Build-By MANIFEST header is set
> > to "stefan". I've learned that it should be set to you're Apache ID.
>
> Well, this must have been that way
thanks for the review and the vote.
On 2014-01-17, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> One minor thing I've noticed is, that the Build-By MANIFEST header is set
> to "stefan". I've learned that it should be set to you're Apache ID.
Well, this must have been that way for all releases I've ever
created. :-)
