Yes, of course. I'm not qualified to do much for Math, but Ted and
others at Mahout are.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
wrote:
> Hi Benson,
>
> I would assume that contributing to commons-math requires some good math
> background whereas primitives seem a little bit easier ...
Hi Benson,
I would assume that contributing to commons-math requires some good math
background whereas primitives seem a little bit easier ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
Benson Margulies wrote:
> So, the silence is rather noisy in response to the discussion about
> commons-math. Commons PMC
So, the silence is rather noisy in response to the discussion about
commons-math. Commons PMC members, what's the story here? Why is it
apparently easy for me to tee up code for primitives and impossible
for the corresponding activity for -math?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Bring them in! We will likely need them as well.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> maps.
>
>
> On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Which part did you care about?
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies > >wrote:
>>
>> Aha, you didn't take
maps.
On Dec 7, 2009, at 5:16 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
Which part did you care about?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies >wrote:
Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the
jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost
messy
enoug
Which part did you care about?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the
> jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost messy
> enough for me to go back to coding from scratch from Knuth.
>
>
Aha, you didn't take the part I care about most, but your grab of the
jet stuff may help me grab the collections stuff. This is almost messy
enough for me to go back to coding from scratch from Knuth.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> It's in the module now called "matrix" - th
It's in the module now called "matrix" - the name "colt" is tradmarked by
CERN, so
we're not using that name as such.
-jake
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I just checked this out and there is no colt in there. I got rev 888157.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:04 PM,
I just checked this out and there is no colt in there. I got rev 888157.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk is the overall
> directory. Colt is just below that. I believe that the pom in the subdir
> will build colt without
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/mahout/trunk is the overall
directory. Colt is just below that. I believe that the pom in the subdir
will build colt without the top-level, but you know more about maven than I
do.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Ted, I just figur
Ted, I just figured out why I should take you up on your offer. Where
in svn is the Mahout fork?
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Mahout has already sucked Colt in. If you are interested in modernizing it,
> that might be a good place to do it.
>
> We are committed to maintai
Oh, drat, NOW I see your addition to the JIRA. Sorry about that.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Niall Pemberton
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> The Colt library contains a pretty good core start to associative
>> containers on basic types:
Um, in my understanding, if there is source code sitting out there
under a 'class A' license, it can be incorporated without being
granted/cleared. I've posted a JIRA to legal-discuss about this
license and I'm not checking anything in until I hear back.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Niall Pembe
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Folks,
>
> The Colt library contains a pretty good core start to associative
> containers on basic types: http://acs.lbl.gov/~hoschek/colt. The
> license looks like it might be an 'A'. I've posted a JIRA to legal to
> check.
The usual pro
Did you already get a legal OK to incorporate things with that CERN notice?
I'm very focused on the collections.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> As you like. Forking from the mahout version might be handy for you since
> it has already had all the GPL parts stripped out.
>
As you like. Forking from the mahout version might be handy for you since
it has already had all the GPL parts stripped out.
Building a trove replace in Mahout's Colt would be nice for us in Mahout
since we need basically the same thing as well. As I mentioned, we want the
Colt part to remain se
I'm trying to make a ASL replacement for Trove, so, license
permitting, I will be forking.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> Mahout has already sucked Colt in. If you are interested in modernizing it,
> that might be a good place to do it.
>
> We are committed to maintaining i
Mahout has already sucked Colt in. If you are interested in modernizing it,
that might be a good place to do it.
We are committed to maintaining its status as an independent library and are
avoiding injecting any other dependencies.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>
> Th
Folks,
The Colt library contains a pretty good core start to associative
containers on basic types: http://acs.lbl.gov/~hoschek/colt. The
license looks like it might be an 'A'. I've posted a JIRA to legal to
check.
--benson
-
To
19 matches
Mail list logo
