On 24 August 2018 at 19:42, sebb wrote:
> On 24 August 2018 at 18:51, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
>> On 24.08.18 15:42, sebb wrote:
>>> If it really is the case that the Apache Parent POM only creates the
>>> checksums for artifacts with a specific name, then IMO it is badly
>>> broken and needs a bug
On 24 August 2018 at 18:51, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 24.08.18 15:42, sebb wrote:
>> If it really is the case that the Apache Parent POM only creates the
>> checksums for artifacts with a specific name, then IMO it is badly
>> broken and needs a bug report.
>
> Feel free. Lines 425 to 454.
>
>> N
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 19:51:04 +0200, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
On 24.08.18 15:42, sebb wrote:
If it really is the case that the Apache Parent POM only creates the
checksums for artifacts with a specific name, then IMO it is badly
broken and needs a bug report.
Feel free. Lines 425 to 454.
Note th
On 24.08.18 15:42, sebb wrote:
> If it really is the case that the Apache Parent POM only creates the
> checksums for artifacts with a specific name, then IMO it is badly
> broken and needs a bug report.
Feel free. Lines 425 to 454.
> Note that it says:
> "For every artifact distributed to the pu
On 24 August 2018 at 14:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 13:13 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl :
>
>> Hi Benedikt,
>>
>> On 23.08.18 18:25, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl > >:
>> >
>> >> Shall we use this for com
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:13:22 +0200, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 13:13 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl
:
Hi Benedikt,
On 23.08.18 18:25, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl
>:
>
>> Shall we use this for commons-parent
Hi Thomas,
Am Fr., 24. Aug. 2018 um 13:13 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl :
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On 23.08.18 18:25, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl >:
> >
> >> Shall we use this for commons-parent?
> >>
> >
> > Sounds reasonable to me.
>
> If I'm not
Hi Benedikt,
On 23.08.18 18:25, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl :
>
>> Shall we use this for commons-parent?
>>
>
> Sounds reasonable to me.
If I'm not mistaken, the requirement for SHA-512 checksums only exists
for the source distribution, not
Am Do., 23. Aug. 2018 um 09:16 Uhr schrieb Thomas Vandahl :
> Shall we use this for commons-parent?
>
Sounds reasonable to me.
Benedikt
>
> Bye, Thomas.
>
> Forwarded Message ----
> Subject: Re: New release distribution checksum policy
> Date: Thu, 23
Shall we use this for commons-parent?
Bye, Thomas.
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: New release distribution checksum policy
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:02:45 +0200
From: Hervé BOUTEMY
Reply-To: memb...@apache.org
To: memb...@apache.org
FYI, Apache parent POM 21 has been released
Date: Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 4:46 PM
Subject: New release distribution checksum policy
To: Apache Members
TLDR;
The release distribution checksum policy requires new releases to use
SHA-512 or SHA-256 and not SHA-1 for verification. Existing releases do not
need to be changed. Releases still need to
11 matches
Mail list logo