Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us -Original Message- From: sebb Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote: -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 6:05 2013/12/31 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us -Original Message- From: sebb Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Did some cleanup in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958 2013/12/30 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache svn. I am still looking for

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org: The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the package ognl; declarations, where as the apache releases will use package org.apache.commons.ognl; I would create a set of proxy classes in the old package space which call the

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:40 2013/12/31 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org: The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the package ognl; declarations, where as the apache releases will use package

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-31 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:37 Did some cleanup in JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL/fixforversion/12323958 OGNL-238, unless I am misreading it, is asking for capabilities that do not exist in Java since the information

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
Is there something I can do for the project? -Jason -Original Message- From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release Your

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache svn. I am still looking for patches in git not yet applied to subversion, do you know of any? All should be already applied or don't affect Apache's version Regards --

Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us: There are a lot of formatting chenges between the version in git and apache svn. I am still looking for patches in git not yet applied to subversion, do

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? Benedikt 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us -Original Message- From: Lukasz Lenart Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 10:51 2013/12/30 Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us:

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the package ognl; declarations, where as the apache releases

Re: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread sebb
On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote: -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what exactly you have in mind. Can you give some examples? The old OGNL (legacy) releases use the

RE: Apache-Legacy class adapters was RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-30 Thread Jason Pyeron
-Original Message- From: sebb Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 17:17 On 30 December 2013 21:21, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote: -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 14:19 Hello Jason, sorry, I don't understand what

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
-Original Message- From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-26 Thread Henri Yandell
[mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-25 Thread Benedikt Ritter
-Original Message- From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-25 Thread Jason Pyeron
#browse/OGNL-240 Is there something I can do for the project? -Jason -Original Message- From: simone.trip...@gmail.com [mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL

RE: [OGNL] A new release

2013-12-24 Thread Jason Pyeron
[mailto:simone.trip...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Simone Tripodi Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 10:35 To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [OGNL] A new release Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-28 Thread Javin Paul
Thanks Simo, that's very neat. On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.orgwrote: Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? Sure, we track resolved issues with fix version:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-28 Thread Simone Tripodi
Your are welcome, Javin! have a nice day, all the best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/ http://twitter.com/simonetripodi http://www.99soft.org/ On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Javin Paul savingfu...@gmail.com wrote: Thanks Simo, that's

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the TODOs. After that we can start planning the release. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Javin Paul
Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 7:09 PM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.orgwrote: I have removed @Deprecated methods, tomorrow will review all the TODOs. After that we can start planning the release. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-27 Thread Simone Tripodi
Is there list of changes, sort of a release notes? Sure, we track resolved issues with fix version: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12313525version=12323958 HTH! -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-232 2013/3/26 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register an issue first in JIRA? Maybe it will be better... Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2013/3/26

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
+1, go for it. Now its time to see if our testcases are good. I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Ok, done. Should I just commit the changes? Or do I have to register an issue first in JIRA?

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: +1, go for it. Now its time to see if our testcases are good. They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-) I also think we should test it in conjunction with struts. Not so easy, OGNL 4 is a different beast, but I'll try ;-)

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: 2013/3/26 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: +1, go for it. Now its time to see if our testcases are good. They are, I made a slight mistake and tests showed that :-) I also think we should test it in

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right place, or at least the only place, where this discussion should happen) Twitter

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right place, or at least the only place, where this

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org wrote: I thought that it won't be a piece of cake, but we might make it easier, for example what about to start a new branch on struts to integrate the new version of OGNL? (perhaps this is not the right place, or at

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java On 26 March 2013 10:12, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: isEvalChain() method isn't available in OGNL 4 Twitter

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/26 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: Do you mean this [1] isEvalChain method? [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/ognl/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/ognl/SimpleNode.java IDEA cheats me ;-) It used wrong version ;-) Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-26 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
FYI I've just started a new thread (http://goo.gl/cx1E5) on Struts dev list Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara VisualizeMe:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 10:11 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote: On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe These nested if

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-06 Thread sebb
On 6 March 2013 06:49, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Hi, I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe These nested if statements could be combined should be resolved, but the rest I don't

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-05 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, I was checking out what should be solved before releasing a new version and in my opinion most of PMD [1] errors can be omitted, maybe These nested if statements could be combined should be resolved, but the rest I don't see a point instead of just satisfying PMD itself. Some of the Findbugs

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? I found this [1], but I have one question, how to check locally how the site will look like before deploying it? I have the only solution: mvn clean

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Olivier Lamy
to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in target/site/) to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can. 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: 2013/3/1 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-03-01 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/3/1 Olivier Lamy ol...@apache.org: to test website it's the usual: mvn clean site (then browse files in target/site/) to deploy: mvn clean site-deploy. and site-content must excluded from rat. Do you want to fix that ? If not I can. I just moved site-content into target/ folder and

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
How can I update ognl website? Simple checkout [1] and update what I need? and then what to do? eg. RAT report is broken as it includes all the html files [2] [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-ognl/ [2]

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Olivier Lamy
to download what ? AFAIK there are no release of Ognl @apache. Will be restored with the first release. 2013/2/27 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: Why the Download section is commented out in the site.xml ? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-231 Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
Olivier is right: No Release No download link. Twitter :http://www.twitter.com/m_cucchiara G+ :https://plus.google.com/107903711540963855921 Linkedin:http://www.linkedin.com/in/mauriziocucchiara VisualizeMe: http://vizualize.me/maurizio.cucchiara?r=maurizio.cucchiara Maurizio

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-02-27 Thread sebb
On 27 February 2013 11:19, Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org wrote: Olivier is right: No Release No download link. I think there should still be a download page, which says that there is no release yet. Otherwise one cannot be sure whether the page (and link) are missing by mistake - as

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-29 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, waiting for INFRA. See vote thread for commons-email. Thanks Jörg! Looks like something changed as ognl build passed on

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-08 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Lukasz, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub requirement for the site and 28 is not ready yet, waiting

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-08 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com: Hi Lukasz, Lukasz Lenart wrote: Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? AFAICS you won't be able to release with 27, because of the new svnpub

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Not sure about the differences of these 2, but I think we cannot release a stable version

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2013/1/8 Christian Grobmeier grobme...@gmail.com: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org wrote: Another issue, I've noticed that the parent is defined as 28-SNAPSHOT, should it be simple 27 - the latest released version? Not sure about the differences of these

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2013-01-07 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Do you know how to exclude some files/directories from the rat-plugin scan ? Right now it includes .idea folder in the scan which produces mass of errors :\ have not tried yet, but it supports an exclude option in the configuration: http://creadur.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/rat-mojo.html

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-28 Thread Lukasz Lenart
How to generate reports locally ? Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-28 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Use the mvn site goal. Benedikt Von meinem iPhone gesendet Am 28.10.2012 um 11:24 schrieb Lukasz Lenart lukaszlen...@apache.org: How to generate reports locally ? Thanks in advance -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/3/9 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org: I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;) let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping on fixing issues :P I have few doubts

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-24 Thread Maurizio Cucchiara
That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of error like this, but they all were more than justified. I'll try to generate the report and see what happens. Sent from my mobile device, so please excuse typos and brevity. Maurizio Cucchiara Il giorno 24/ott/2012

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-10-24 Thread Lukasz Lenart
2012/10/24 Maurizio Cucchiara mcucchi...@apache.org: That's really weird, last time I have seen (and also corrected) a bunch of error like this, but they all were more than justified. I'll try to generate the report and see what happens. Maybe the website is out of sync ? How to deploy a new

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
Hi Lukasz, I am worried that current number of detected PMD/CPD/findbugs/checkstyle/ co.[1] is too under the quality here at commons are used to, before releasing a component. It would be great having them fixed before releasing, then I can quickly cut a new RC (I am now used to cover the

Re: [OGNL] A new release

2012-03-09 Thread Simone Tripodi
I don't think it is necessary when fixing this kind of issues, unless you need to heavily change the code, but I don't suspect so ;) let me know if I can be helpful in some way - more than just helping on fixing issues :P best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/