Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

FYI for the Hadoop common-dev@ list, this [VOTE] passed [1]. I don't think the [RESULT] was echoed over here, so I'm just sending this as a quick notice to anyone in the Hadoop community who may have been watching the thread. If you're interested in watching next steps, then please subscribe to

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

My +1 FTR Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mo., 21. März 2016 um 09:45 Uhr: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache > Commons component. > > Proposed name: Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

>I am also worried about the JNI stuff, but I think a new group of developers would be good for this community. Thanks Oliver for your opinion. Yes, handful of members in this below community are really very good at JNI and Java. Also we would consider to explore on JNA stuff which was

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) +common-dev@hadoop On 3/21/16, 6:59 PM, "Gangumalla, Uma" wrote: >+1 (non-binding) > > >Regards, >Uma > >On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>after long discussions I think we have gathered enough

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 Gary On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 1:45 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache > Commons component. > > Proposed name: Apache Commons

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component +1 (non-binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" <brit...@apache.org> wrote: >Hi all, > >after long discussions I think we have gathered

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) --Chris Nauroth On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: >Hi all, > >after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to >decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache >Commons component. > >Proposed name:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

On 21.03.16 09:45, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > [X] +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > [ ] +0 OK, but... > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix... > [ ] -1 I oppose this because... Bye, Thomas - To

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Since we already started to use fractional numbers, I would be +0.5. I am also worried about the JNI stuff, but I think a new group of developers would be good for this community. Oliver Am 21.03.2016 um 09:45 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Dapeng Sun wrote: > +1 (non-binding) Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > 2016-03-22 10:05 GMT+08:00 Chen, Haifeng : > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > -Original Message- > > From:

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

ommons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Any reason JNI cannot be replaced by JNA? (sorry for the hijack!) Gary On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > -0.9 ditto > > I tru

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component 2016-03-22 10:05 GMT+08:00 Chen, Haifeng : > +1 (non-binding) > > -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:46 PM > To: Commons Developers

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Chen, Haifeng [mailto:haifeng.c...@intel.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 10:06 AM To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Cc: Hadoop Common <common-...@hadoop.apache.org> Subject: RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Ap

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

to support and influence it. Regards, Haifeng -Original Message- From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:21 AM To: Commons Developers List <dev@commons.apache.org> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component -0.9 ditto I trust all the

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Any reason JNI cannot be replaced by JNA? (sorry for the hijack!) Gary On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:21 PM, sebb wrote: > -0.9 ditto > > I trust all the people voting +1 are prepared to help maintain the > code, including the JNI bits? > > > On 21 March 2016 at 18:13, James

RE: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -Original Message- From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:brit...@apache.org] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 4:46 PM To: Commons Developers List Cc: Hadoop Common Subject: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) Regards, Uma On 3/21/16, 1:45 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote: >Hi all, > >after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to >decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache >Commons component. > >Proposed name: Apache

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

-0.9 ditto I trust all the people voting +1 are prepared to help maintain the code, including the JNI bits? On 21 March 2016 at 18:13, James Carman wrote: > -0, I don't like the idea of a JNI library. > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:45 AM Benedikt Ritter

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

-0, I don't like the idea of a JNI library. On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 4:45 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a new Apache > Commons component.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 for the new component However the name may be misleading since the scope is limited. Emmanuel Bourg Le 21/03/2016 09:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Hi all, > > after long discussions I think we have gathered enough information to > decide whether we want to accept the Chimera project as a

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) -- bart...@x-reizend.de > On 21 Mar 2016, at 11:05, Sergio Fernández wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > >> +1 for new component. >> >> Luc >> >> Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 (non-binding) On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > +1 for new component. > > Luc > > Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit : > > +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > > > > > Gruss > > Bernd > > > > Von: Benedikt Ritter > >

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 for new component. Luc Le 21/03/2016 09:57, Bernd Eckenfels a écrit : > +1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component > > > Gruss > Bernd > > Von: Benedikt Ritter > Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:45 > An: Commons Developers List > Cc: Hadoop Common > Betreff: [VOTE] Accept Chimera

Re: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component

+1 Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Gruss Bernd Von: Benedikt Ritter Gesendet: Montag, 21. März 2016 09:45 An: Commons Developers List Cc: Hadoop Common Betreff: [VOTE] Accept Chimera as new Apache Commons Component Hi all, after long discussions I think we have gathered enough