Hi Jörg!
Sounds I have a huge TODO list of fixes for tomorrow, I'm too tired to
fix them now, time to sleep :P
Thanks for the feedbacks and suggestions, have a nice day!
Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Simo,
Simone Tripodi wrote:
> we already discussed about it, and choose the option to let users
> extend the classes for 2 reasons:
> - be reused inside IoC/DI containers that create dynamic proxies
> - specialize classes with generic types (class
> MyTransformedBinaryProcedure extends Trans
we already discussed about it, and choose the option to let users
extend the classes for 2 reasons:
- be reused inside IoC/DI containers that create dynamic proxies
- specialize classes with generic types (class
MyTransformedBinaryProcedure extends TransformedBinaryProcedure)
yes, checkstyle com
On 14 September 2011 20:34, wrote:
> Author: simonetripodi
> Date: Wed Sep 14 19:34:37 2011
> New Revision: 1170805
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1170805&view=rev
> Log:
> fixed checkstyle violation: Method 'hashCode' is not designed for extension -
> needs to be abstract, final or e
