> > [...]
> >> The reason that I wanted to point out the top coding was that I
> >> thought it might be possible results that were equal, but had
> >> different internal representations could be returned over the
> >> interval (-1E-9, 1E-9), where the actual value is close to but less
> >> than 1.
On 10/9/11 9:38 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:45:51AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/9/11 5:09 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> Answering with a few examples:
> x=1.00e-15 f=1.00
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 07:45:51AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/9/11 5:09 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> >>> Answering with a few examples:
> >>> x=1.00e-15 f=1.00e+00
> >>> s=1.00
On 10/9/11 5:09 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
>>> Answering with a few examples:
>>> x=1.00e-15 f=1.00e+00
>>> s=1.00e+00
>>> x=5.001000e-15 f=1.00e+00
>>>
On Sun, Oct 09, 2011 at 10:32:38AM +0200, Sébastien Brisard wrote:
> >
> > Answering with a few examples:
> > x=1.00e-15 f=1.00e+00
> > s=1.00e+00
> > x=5.001000e-15 f=1.00e+00
> > s=1.00e+00
> > x=2.5
>
> Answering with a few examples:
> x=1.00e-15 f=1.00e+00
> s=1.00e+00
> x=5.001000e-15 f=1.00e+00
> s=1.00e+00
> x=2.500400e-14 f=1.00e+00
> s=1.00e+00
> x=1.
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:29:21PM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/8/11 2:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> >> On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> >>> Hi Phil.
> >>>
> Can you live with r1180315?
> >>> [I guess that you
On 10/8/11 2:12 PM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
>>> Hi Phil.
>>>
Can you live with r1180315?
>>> [I guess that you are talking to me.]
>>>
>>> I still stand with the arguments of my other p
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:21:23AM -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> > Hi Phil.
> >
> >> Can you live with r1180315?
> > [I guess that you are talking to me.]
> >
> > I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant
> > being confu
On 10/8/11 5:05 AM, Gilles Sadowski wrote:
> Hi Phil.
>
>> Can you live with r1180315?
> [I guess that you are talking to me.]
>
> I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant
> being confusing for the "non numerics-aware" users.
> However, I can understand that we
Hi Phil.
> Can you live with r1180315?
[I guess that you are talking to me.]
I still stand with the arguments of my other post about this "1e-9" constant
being confusing for the "non numerics-aware" users.
However, I can understand that we may want to also document the departure
from the math d
Can you live with r1180315?
Phil
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >> /**
> >> - * Sinc function.
> >> + * Sinc function, defined by
> >> + *
> >> + * sinc(x) = 1 if abs(x) < 1e-9;
> >> + * sin(x) / x; otherwise
> >> + *
> >
> > I would not document the first part of the alternative since it is an
> > implementation detail. "1e-9" was chosen
On Oct 7, 2011, at 2:59 AM, gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:20:40AM -, pste...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: psteitz
>> Date: Fri Oct 7 03:20:39 2011
>> New Revision: 1179928
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1179928&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Javadoc f
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 03:20:40AM -, pste...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: psteitz
> Date: Fri Oct 7 03:20:39 2011
> New Revision: 1179928
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1179928&view=rev
> Log:
> Javadoc fixes.
>
> Modified:
> [...]
>
> commons/proper/math/trunk/src/main/java/
15 matches
Mail list logo
