On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 08:12:48AM +0100, Dennis Hendriks wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Now that I look at this code again, should we not attempt to avoid
> divide by zero in case a == b, in this method, and perhaps other
> methods of this class?
>
> Also, looking that the Wikipedia article, at
> http://e
Sébastien Brisard wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Hi all,
Now that I look at this code again, should we not attempt to avoid divide by
zero in case a == b, in this method, and perhaps other methods of this
class?
I think the constructor takes care of this special case.
>(...)
Yes, you're right.
Dennis
Hi Dennis,
> Hi all,
>
> Now that I look at this code again, should we not attempt to avoid divide by
> zero in case a == b, in this method, and perhaps other methods of this
> class?
>
I think the constructor takes care of this special case.
>
> Also, looking that the Wikipedia article, at
> http
Hi all,
Now that I look at this code again, should we not attempt to avoid divide
by zero in case a == b, in this method, and perhaps other methods of this
class?
Also, looking that the Wikipedia article, at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangular_distribution (which is referenced
in the ja
