On 5 March 2013 08:38, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> the current download_*.xml contains the version in a lot of places.
> What about using a property in the pom:
> x.x.x.
> moving the download_*.xml to download_*.xml.vm and replace hard coded
> version with ${currentReleasedVersion}.
> That will be only
the current download_*.xml contains the version in a lot of places.
What about using a property in the pom:
x.x.x.
moving the download_*.xml to download_*.xml.vm and replace hard coded
version with ${currentReleasedVersion}.
That will be only one place to update the value.
2013/3/5 sebb :
> On 4 M
On 4 March 2013 20:58, Olivier Lamy wrote:
> why not modifying the file in sources and regenerate the site ?
That would have been extra work, and probably have resulted in a huge
commit mail.
Also, I just wanted to fix it quickly.
>
> 2013/3/4 :
>> Author: sebb
>> Date: Mon Mar 4 18:32:41 201
why not modifying the file in sources and regenerate the site ?
2013/3/4 :
> Author: sebb
> Date: Mon Mar 4 18:32:41 2013
> New Revision: 852981
>
> Log:
> Latest version is 3.2; 3.3 has yet to be released
>
> Modified:
> websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-net/download_net.h