Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

On 16 February 2015 at 07:53, Reto Gmür wrote: > My SMTP server was having some problems so the mail below was not posted. > > I've made some more commits today with some initial code of a Sparql backed > implementation, but the interesting bits are still missing > > > Cheers, > Reto > > On Su

Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

On 24 January 2015 at 01:12, Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Minto > > Thanks for your comments. > >> 1) I am glad you chose to derive from Collections. This opens up the >> > possibility to use Java 8 streams to improve performance especially >> in >> > the filter() method. >> > 2) Hmm, is

Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

My SMTP server was having some problems so the mail below was not posted. I've made some more commits today with some initial code of a Sparql backed implementation, but the interesting bits are still missing Cheers, Reto On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Reto Gmür wrote: > Hi Minto, all, >

Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

Hi Minto Thanks for your comments. > 1) I am glad you chose to derive from Collections. This opens up the > > possibility to use Java 8 streams to improve performance especially > in > > the filter() method. > > 2) Hmm, is filter() still required if we can use java 8 streams > >

Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Minto van der Sluis mailto:mi...@xup.nl>> wrote: Hi Reto, Thanks for showing interest in my opinion. First of all the whole discussion around commons-rdf involves way to much religion. Religion as in: my implemention should be reference

Re: your opinion on commons-rdf proposal

Sure! Reto Gmür schreef op 15-1-2015 om 10:06: > Hi Minto, > > Thanks a lot for your valuable comments. Would you mind reposting to > the mailing list as to have tis discussion public? > > Cheers, > Reto > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 9:01 AM, Minto van der Sluis > wrote: > >