On 18/08/2009, joe...@apache.org joe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: joehni
Date: Tue Aug 18 12:22:35 2009
New Revision: 805384
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=805384view=rev
Log:
Make FileSystemOptions cloneable (VFS-278).
Modified:
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote at Dienstag, 18. August 2009 14:48:
+
+/**
+ * {...@inheritdoc}
+ */
+public Object clone() {
+FileSystemOptions clone = new FileSystemOptions();
+clone.options = new TreeMap(options);
+return clone;
+}
This
On 18/08/2009, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote at Dienstag, 18. August 2009 14:48:
+
+/**
+ * {...@inheritdoc}
+ */
+public Object clone() {
+FileSystemOptions clone = new FileSystemOptions();
+
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 7:48 AM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote at Dienstag, 18. August 2009 14:48:
+
+/**
+ * {...@inheritdoc}
+ */
+public Object clone() {
+
Hi!
From personal experience, I've found working with it
to be awkward and brittle. I would much prefer to have each provider
subclass FileSystemOptions and provide the getters and setters there. Then,
at least, you could do an instanceof on the FileSystemOptions and determine
what options
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 11:08 AM, Stefan Bodewigbode...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
over in Ant land we've received a bug report that Ant's ftp task
wouldn't compile against commons-net 2,0 because the IMAGE_FILE_TYPE
constant was removed from the FTP class.
Given that trunk still has that
sebb wrote:
On 18/08/2009, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Sebb,
sebb wrote at Dienstag, 18. August 2009 14:48:
+
+/**
+ * {...@inheritdoc}
+ */
+public Object clone() {
+FileSystemOptions clone = new FileSystemOptions();
+
Hi Mario,
Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
From personal experience, I've found working with it
to be awkward and brittle. I would much prefer to have each provider
subclass FileSystemOptions and provide the getters and setters there.
Then, at least, you could do an instanceof on the
On Aug 18, 2009, at 10:18 AM, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
Hi!
From personal experience, I've found working with it
to be awkward and brittle. I would much prefer to have each provider
subclass FileSystemOptions and provide the getters and setters
there. Then,
at least, you could do an
