Hi,
Is there a way to enforce a per account exclusive access to the broker?
For example if a user has an opened connection to the broker, when he
opens another connection the first one is automatically closed.
Emmanuel Bourg
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
We are sorry we have to inform you that this functionality is not yet
implemented, but is planned for the Q1 release in 2019.
;-)) sorry, couldn't resist ... I guess, you wouldn't want your mail sent to
commons-dev, no?
Ciao,
Mario
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Emmanuel Bourg
Le 09/07/2010 10:50, Mario Ivankovits (Apache) a écrit :
We are sorry we have to inform you that this functionality is not yet
implemented, but is planned for the Q1 release in 2019.
;-)) sorry, couldn't resist ... I guess, you wouldn't want your mail sent to
commons-dev, no?
Ciao,
Mario
On 9 July 2010 14:15, er...@apache.org wrote:
Author: erans
Date: Fri Jul 9 13:15:28 2010
New Revision: 962515
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=962515view=rev
Log:
MATH-361
Modified:
Le 09/07/2010 01:45, er...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: erans
/** {...@inheritdoc} */
@Override
public String getMessage() {
-return MessageFactory.buildMessage(Locale.US, pattern, arguments);
+final StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
+
+if
I don't how we can use the same arguments in both the general and
specific messages and later combine them together.
The place holders {0}, {1}, ... will be replaced by the corresponding
argument in both the specific and the general patterns.
How is this different
from a more complete
public PolynomialFunction(double c[]) {
super();
if (c.length 1) {
- throw
MathRuntimeException.createIllegalArgumentException(LocalizedFormats.EMPTY_POLYNOMIALS_COEFFICIENTS_ARRAY);
+ throw new
On 9 July 2010 18:35, Gilles Sadowski gil...@harfang.homelinux.org wrote:
public PolynomialFunction(double c[]) {
super();
if (c.length 1) {
- throw
