On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 2:22 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/06/2009, Niklas Gustavsson nik...@protocol7.com wrote:
Interesting.
Could be useful for parts of Commons Codec, Mail, Net.
Seems to me it fits in with the Commons charter, and other projects
that could benefit from it (e.g
Hi
Over at Apache MINA, we have voted in Vysper as a subproject. The
Vysper project came with a bunch of code for tracking compliance to a
specification (e.g. RFC) using a set of annotations. it also contains
an APT based tool for producing reports based on these annotations.
Here's the current
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 7:54 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two different artifactIDs for seemingly the same artifact, added by
two different people in the same diff.
My bad, I used the build-helper-maven-plugin to get the FTP-only
client into the Maven lifecycle so that it will get
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Binaries and source jars are available from the usual download locations
once replication has completed. Note that this release contains a cut-down
FTP-only jar for clients who just need FTP functionality.
It doesn't seem
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+-0/1 as you think fit, thanks!
Looks good to me. +1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 10/1/08, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/09/2008, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I havent explicitly put the pom.xml under
META_INF/maven/commons-net/commons-net
...I suspect Maven may have done this itself.
But is it correct?
If not, will the incorrect
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, sorry, I just realised that I have an older key in my key list which
must be the default for signing. I've uploaded it to pgp.mit.edu and I will
add it to the appropriate KEYS file as well.
Now find it at pgp.mit.edu.
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:05 AM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Done!
Great, +1 on releasing.
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Updated keys, checksums, etc, and added a release notes doc
I still can't seem to find the key used for signing the artifacts
(B6E5C0E2)., neither in:
http://www.apache.org/dist/commons/KEYS
nor in:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Daniel F. Savarese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think the examples should be pre-compiled at all. They are
source code examples that demonstrate how to use the API. Unless
something has changed recently, they are not intended as fully
functional programs
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The RC for net-2.0 is available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0
Changes are here:
http://people.apache.org/~rwinston/commons-net-2.0/site/changes-report.html#a2.0
Can someone take a
Hi
commons-net still uses commons-net as the groupId. Other commons
components (including the parent POM) seems to have changed to
org.apache.commons. Is there any reason for not making the same change
for net?
/niklas
-
To
On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 12:07 AM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Niklas Gustavsson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
suggestion to refactor the Commons Net small protocol
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 3:05 PM, Oberhuber, Martin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The backward compatibility question you mention was about the
suggestion to refactor the Commons Net small protocol
implementations into separate packages each:
Oh, that was not my understanding. But since there hasn't
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hereby call a vote to promote commons-exec from commons sandbox to proper
+1
/niklas
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+) I think that one or two commons developers will use the code and might
provide additional support if needed
I'm certainly one of those.
/niklas
-
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Siegfried Goeschl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
according to http://wiki.apache.org/commons/MovingFromSandboxToProperSVN
there needs to be an official proposal - any blockers from moving
commons-exec to commons proper?!
As someone partially to blame for the code, +1
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:37 PM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly are you having trouble with? What is not working on
linux? What behavior are you seeing? Are you getting an exception?
If so, can you provide a stack trace, please.
Venkar does state that he is seeing a
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:00 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-220 is about thread safety
of TftpServer.
Can the patch be applied?
I'm happy to do it.
Looks good to me. +1.
I don't think NET 2.0 should be released without fixing this (either
using
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I meant to say out of the project. It was moved to test/ after the
discussion.
Great, so it seems we agree :-) However, the class is still in
src/main, not in src/test:
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:18 AM, bperquku [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, name of the file is not relevant. The server process check for
files (not for names) and is implemented by someone else (i dont have source
code).
You didn't mention what protocol you are using, is it FTP?
/niklas
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 12:48 AM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had this discussion already (at great length). It's not going to
test/src.
Search through the archives, I managed to find a discussion on this
very topic from March this year, however in the thread it seems like
you
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 7:36 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you be able to try the patches I just attached to NET-220?
That should be enough to make the TFTPServer class threadsafe, and may
address the shutdown problem.
Didn't help with the issue I'm seeing.
When on the topic of
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 11:59 PM, Rory Winston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we ready to cut another RC? I can do so if you guys are happy with where
we're at.
I still got this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-217
I haven't look into any depth at why it's happening, but changing
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 5:29 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think I saw the same error, but only once, so I assumed it was
something else happening on my system.
If it's occurring regularly, then there may be a problem with
releasing the port from previous tests in the same class.
Yeah,
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/08, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would prefer to get 2.0 out there as well. I would rather see us be
fixing bugs as found by users than keeping it around for even longer
in the current state. It's
Hi
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:06 PM, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
tags and branches, but always get test failures.
Things have improved significantly on the 2.0 branch, thanks! Now I'm
just getting one failed
Hi
I feel really bad about not giving commons-exec the love it needs.
Nice to see some additional testing going on with the code. Have you
found any bugs that need fixing?
Could we include these tests as part of the exec project? I would be
happy to help out with the integration if needed. In
would love to have a 2.0 release out, but it should build without
any test failures.
/niklas
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:58 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trunk (Java 1.3+)
and
branches/NET_2_0 (Java 1.5)
have the most recent fixes.
On 07/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 12:11 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08/04/2008, Niklas Gustavsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My bad, the branches/NET_2_0 actually gives the following test failures:
which JVM are you using for this?
I don't see the error in 1.5.0 or 1.6.0 (Sun/WinXP).
I'm
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 3:38 PM, sebb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How many CPUs does the system have?
It's a dual core laptop.
I raised JIRA NET-213 to record the bug you reported.
Thanks!
Do you see any problem with always using the default platform encoding
when converting the line
Hi
From where is this code built? I've tried building from some different
tags and branches, but always get test failures. Here's the summaries
and the relevant surefire reports are attached.
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/net/tags/NET_2_0_RC3/
Tests in error:
32 matches
Mail list logo
