Re: Javadoc usability

2024-05-18 Thread sebb
If we are changing the Javadoc settings, we should update the footer to include the full list of attributions. On Sat, 18 May 2024 at 12:59, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Le 18/05/2024 à 13:07, Gary Gregory a écrit : > > You must be talking about this: > > > >

Re: (commons-lang) branch master updated: Adding the @Insecure, and @Safe annotations.

2024-05-16 Thread sebb
On Fri, 17 May 2024 at 00:11, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Can we PLEASE not do this unless we know what the plan is for Commons > overall? I really don't want to have this stuff copied in all Commons > Components because I doubt we will want to add Commons Lang as a dependency > in all Components.

Re: Is there a blog for commons?

2024-04-19 Thread sebb
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 16:11, Gary Gregory wrote: > > It sounds to me like the Apache wide news blog is the best place or the > site. Or both: - ASF news could have a general blog entry that draws attention to the feature - Commons site would be used for more specific entries. Posting on the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-alpha5

2024-04-18 Thread sebb
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 16:07, Gary Gregory wrote: > > The Apache Commons Imaging team is pleased to announce the release of > Apache Commons Imaging 1.0.0-alpha5. > > Apache Commons Imaging (previously Sanselan) is a pure-Java image library. > > The 1.0.0-alpha5 release requires Java 8. > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-07 Thread sebb
On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 17:51, Thomas Vandahl wrote: > > Hi Sebastian > > > Am 06.04.2024 um 15:38 schrieb sebb : > > > > Another minor issue: > > If you run 'mvn test' without first doing 'mvn clean', it fails with: > > > > [ERROR] JDBCDiskCacheUnitT

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons JCS 3.2.1 based on rc1

2024-04-06 Thread sebb
Another minor issue: If you run 'mvn test' without first doing 'mvn clean', it fails with: [ERROR] JDBCDiskCacheUnitTest.testInitializePoolAccess_withPoolName:157 » SQL Table already exists: JCSTESTTABLE_INITIALIZEPOOLACCESS in statement [CREATE CACHED TABLE JCSTESTTABLE_InitializePoolAccess]

Re: Proposal to make DomainValidator#isValidDomainSyntax public in commons-validator

2024-04-02 Thread sebb
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 at 15:40, mogasale.tech wrote: > > Thanks for the response. > > I have thoughts about this change not only within DomainValidator, but also > to make it configurable at the two classes (EmailValidator and > UrlValidator) where DomainValidator#isValid is consumed today. > > I'll

Re: [LANG] EqualsBuilder#reflectionEquals feature brainstorming

2024-03-07 Thread sebb
Could one calculate the hashes for each entry, sort them, and then generate the hash for the collection? On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 06:59, Mark Struberg wrote: > > The question to me is how we can make it more robust. > In a Collection (but actually also in most lists) the order in which you get >

Re: [Net] JUnit 5 migration discussion

2024-02-29 Thread sebb
Would it make sense to just convert the JUnit 3 tests to JUnit4? Or would that be a waste of time? On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 21:19, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Oops, I mean TestNG. > > Gary > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024, 3:41 PM Gary Gregory wrote: > > > Thank you for digging into this Eric. > > > >

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-29 Thread sebb
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 09:53, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi sebb, > > On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 10:25, sebb wrote: > > > but dependency management can be used to > > > prevent version mismatches. > > > > What dependency management is that? Does Mav

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-29 Thread sebb
On Thu, 29 Feb 2024 at 00:13, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi sebb, > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 23:48, sebb wrote: > > > Remark that I am talking about moving whole packages to new artifacts. > > > > Will these packages be renamed? > > > > If not,

Re: commons-compress 1.26.0 optional dependency on commons-codec causes runtime failure.

2024-02-28 Thread sebb
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 20:06, Piotr P. Karwasz wrote: > > Hi Romain, > > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 16:30, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > > > Hmm, splitting will require a package change at least for osgi. > > OSGi should be painless: the common practice is to use > `Import-Package` instead of

Re: [commons-net] issue: FTP other HTTP with Proxy-Authorization fail

2024-02-13 Thread sebb
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024 at 00:40, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 16:40, Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > > > > Be careful with this one. I don't have full context, but this looks > > likely to be a real bug on some code paths and perhaps not a bug on > >

Re: [commons-net] issue: FTP other HTTP with Proxy-Authorization fail

2024-02-12 Thread sebb
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 16:40, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote: > > Be careful with this one. I don't have full context, but this looks > likely to be a real bug on some code paths and perhaps not a bug on > others. We'll need to make sure that the patch for the broken code > path doesn't break a

Re: [LOGGING] 2.0

2024-02-10 Thread sebb
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 16:27, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hi All: > > I want to focus on content before we decide what label to put on the > next release. Then, we can see if we want to break binary > compatibility (BC) for a Commons Logging 2.0.0. > > My main driver for the next version is to drop

Re: (commons-numbers) branch master updated: Simplify conversion of numbers to unsigned

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 16:58, wrote: > > This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. > > aherbert pushed a commit to branch master > in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-numbers.git > > > The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this

Re: [MATH][NUMBERS] Method to convert unsigned long to BigInteger

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 16:14, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 13:58, sebb wrote: > > > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 13:16, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 11:45, Elliotte Rusty Harold > > > wrote: > > >

Re: [IO][ALL?] PRs should NOT deploy snapshots

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
Oops; fixed On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 15:49, Gary Gregory wrote: > > It seems that [IO] tries and fails to deploy snapshots for PRs. That > should not happen, the deploying, that is. > > PR log: > ... > [INFO] --- maven-deploy-plugin:3.1.1:deploy (default-deploy) @ commons-io --- > 189[INFO] >

[ALL] Issue with compiler plugin 3.12.0 (fixed in 3.12.1)

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
FTR, in case compiles fail with an unexpected error: There was a regression in 3.12.0: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MCOMPILER-567 Should be fixed in 3.12.1, which has just been released. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail

Re: [MATH][NUMBERS] Method to convert unsigned long to BigInteger

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 13:16, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Dec 2023 at 11:45, Elliotte Rusty Harold > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Dec 24, 2023 at 9:59 AM sebb wrote: > > > > > > Both Numbers and Statistics have implementations of > >

[MATH][NUMBERS] Method to convert unsigned long to BigInteger

2023-12-24 Thread sebb
Both Numbers and Statistics have implementations of BigInteger toUnsignedBigInteger(long treatedAsUnsigned) But these methods are in test classes. Seems to me it would be useful to provide a public version of the method, but where does it belong? Sebb

Re: [MATH] MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testCircleFitting flaky test

2023-12-23 Thread sebb
On Sat, 23 Dec 2023 at 15:44, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > Le sam. 23 déc. 2023 à 16:30, sebb a écrit : > > > > The test MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testCircleFitting [1] > > seems to be flaky. > > > > It often fails with values below

[MATH] MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testCircleFitting flaky test

2023-12-23 Thread sebb
The test MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testCircleFitting [1] seems to be flaky. It often fails with values below the expected minimum of 750. Does this indicate a real failure, or can the minimum be safely reduced? Sebb [1] https://github.com/apache/commons-math/blob

Re: [TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
gt; JUnit 5 has broken in compatibility but I've not taken the time to pursue > it. So Sandbox? > Gary > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, 12:31 PM sebb wrote: > > > There is a repo at https://github.com/apache/commons-testing, but > > almost no actual code changes. > >

[TESTING] What is the status of this component?

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
There is a repo at https://github.com/apache/commons-testing, but almost no actual code changes. The component does not appear in the sandbox, dormant or proper categories, and I could find no website for it. Seems to me the repo should at least be flagged as dormant or sandbox. Sebb

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
t sure we need to go this far here, > but there might be tidbits there that may prove useful. > > Gary > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, 8:25 AM sebb wrote: > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:03, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > I think it would be a nice-to-have f

Re: [NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 16:16, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 at 13:19, sebb wrote: > > > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:08, Alex Herbert wrote: > > > > > > Thanks Sebb, > > > > > > Note that previously the GH action was running

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
other requests. > Gary > > On Tue, Dec 19, 2023, 5:41 AM sebb wrote: > > > Crypto now has a workflow [4] that deploys a SNAPSHOT version. > > > > I don't know if we want to do this for all components, but if so, the > > process is: > > - ra

Re: [NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-20 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 16:08, Alex Herbert wrote: > > Thanks Sebb, > > Note that previously the GH action was running the default goal: > 'clean verify javadoc:javadoc'. > > Since we now need to specify the 'deploy' goal as well the above > defaults can be switched in

[NUMBERS] GH deploy snapshot test

2023-12-19 Thread sebb
Created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25297 to get access to credentials Added code to maven.yml to deploy the snapshot (needs to be enabled when creds are granted) - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-19 Thread sebb
On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 12:25, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 at 10:41, sebb wrote: > > > > Crypto now has a workflow [4] that deploys a SNAPSHOT version. > > > > I don't know if we want to do this for all components, but if so, the > > process i

[ALL] Deploying SNAPSHOTS from GH workflows

2023-12-19 Thread sebb
together. Other components will be much simpler. Are there any other components that would benefit from/need snapshots? Sebb [1] e.g. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25296 [2] https://github.com/actions/setup-java#maven-options [3] https://github.com/actions/setup-java/blob/main/docs

Re: Need info about release of new commons crypto version with openssl3.0.x support

2023-12-18 Thread sebb
In the meantime, I have uploaded a SNAPSHOT version. You may wish to try this out, so any issues can hopefully be sorted before the next release. Warning: SNAPSHOT versions have not been QA'ed, and may misbehave and crash. Use at your own risk and never use them in production systems. On Mon, 18

Re: Apache Common Lang -- How do I compile or did I find a bug

2023-12-12 Thread sebb
On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 14:21, Alex Herbert wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 at 13:20, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > What's the best way to document this do you think? > > That lang is tested (and so should be built) with the latest JDK of > the respective stable release (8, 11, 17, 21)? > > This

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL Version 6.8.0

2023-12-09 Thread sebb
Done in https://lists.apache.org/thread/mg4nmvtptg1c7w600p3okmbmynt3rc2g On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 at 17:26, sebb wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 at 17:06, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > > > Hej Gary, > > > > The "historical list of changes" is 404 for me... > >

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache Commons BCEL Version 6.8.0

2023-12-09 Thread sebb
On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 at 17:06, Tamás Cservenák wrote: > > Hej Gary, > > The "historical list of changes" is 404 for me... It should be: https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-bcel/changes-report.html It might be possible to put in a temporary redirect ... > Thanks > T > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2023

Re: [CRYPTO] Basic SSL 3.x support added

2023-12-06 Thread sebb
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 13:44, sebb wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 11:57, sebb wrote: > > > > The test suite now runs on ubuntu-latest, windows-latest and > > macos-latest with Java 8,11,17,21 > > > > On macOS, the OpenSSL library path has to be provid

Re: Is https://twitter.com/ApacheCommons still used?

2023-12-02 Thread sebb
ot exactly busy. As such, I don't think it is worth promoting. Whether it should be closed is another matter. Sebb On Sat, 2 Dec 2023 at 13:19, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > I think the password is in svn? In the pmc or private folder if I recall > correctly. > > On Sat, 2 Dec 2023, 1

Is https://twitter.com/ApacheCommons still used?

2023-11-30 Thread sebb
AFAICT https://twitter.com/ApacheCommons is no longer active, and links to it should be dropped. Note that it is not visible without a login. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional

Re: [SITE] Remove markmail from mailing list pages

2023-11-29 Thread sebb
to the page on the main site. Much easier to make future changes. And maybe gradually update the component site sources so the redirect becomes unnecessary. I'll see about fixing that shortly. Sebb On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 17:56, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > I should have included the page, I am

Re: [SITE] Remove markmail from mailing list pages

2023-11-29 Thread sebb
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 17:44, Bruno Kinoshita wrote: > > Hi, > > We got an issue in Jena to remove Markmail from the mailing list page as > the domain name was deactivated, and the service decommissioned. > > I logged in to the Apache mailing list just now to cast some votes for > Commons

Re: [All] Download page broken for several components

2023-11-28 Thread sebb
Doh! Mea culpa. Turns out this issue had previously been solved, but during a clear-up I managed to remove the work-rounds. Hopefully all now resolved. Sebb On Tue, 28 Nov 2023 at 11:22, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 15:32, sebb wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2

Re: [All] Download page broken for several components

2023-11-28 Thread sebb
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 15:32, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 11:41, sebb wrote: > > > > I think the pages should be > > > > https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-geometry/download_geometry.cgi > > > > etc. > > > >

Re: [All] Download page broken for several components

2023-11-27 Thread sebb
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 11:41, sebb wrote: > > I think the pages should be > > https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-geometry/download_geometry.cgi > > etc. > > Looks like a missing redirect; will have a look later. There are redirects from https://commons.apache.

Re: [All] Download page broken for several components

2023-11-27 Thread sebb
I think the pages should be https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-geometry/download_geometry.cgi etc. Looks like a missing redirect; will have a look later. On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 02:55, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Hello. > > For >

Re: [CRYPTO] Basic SSL 3.x support added

2023-11-24 Thread sebb
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 11:57, sebb wrote: > > The test suite now runs on ubuntu-latest, windows-latest and > macos-latest with Java 8,11,17,21 > > On macOS, the OpenSSL library path has to be provided, otherwise the > test can crash with > > '"...bin/java is loadi

Re: [VALIDATOR] - Release of newer version of validator without OWASP vulnerabilities

2023-11-23 Thread sebb
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 13:05, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Hello, > > First, if you want to disclose a vulnerability in a Commons component > itself, please read https://commons.apache.org/security.html > > Now, back to dependencies. > > In general, we use GitHub's Dependabot to inform us of new

Re: [CRYPTO] Basic SSL 3.x support added

2023-11-23 Thread sebb
st pulled master and successfully ran tests against OpenSSL 3.1.3 on Mac > OS 11 BigSur. Nice work sebb! > > Apache Commons Crypto 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > Native code loaded OK: 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT > > Native name: Apache Commons Crypto > > Native built: Nov 17 2023 > > OpenSSL l

[CRYPTO] cross-build and test now separate

2023-11-16 Thread sebb
at the same time. This may cause issues with the test job, but this should be a fairly rare occurrence. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [CRYPTO] Basic SSL 3.x support added

2023-11-14 Thread sebb
playing around with it. Yes, it is in master. > Alex > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 7:12 PM sebb wrote: > > > Crypto now builds and tests OK on > > macOS-latest - OpenSSL 3.1.4 24 Oct 2023 > > and > > Ubuntu-latest - OpenSSL 3.0.2 15 Mar 2022 > > Tested with

Re: [CRYPTO] Drop support for OpenSSL < 1.1 ?

2023-11-09 Thread sebb
We don't do that before bumping the minimum Java version ... On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 10:26, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Maybe post this on the user's ML just in case? > > Gary > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2023, 8:13 PM Alex Remily wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Wed, Nov 8,

Re: [CRYPTO] Drop support for OpenSSL < 1.1 ?

2023-11-08 Thread sebb
I would really like to drop support for the oldest versions of SSL, i.e. 1.0.x These are seriously out of date. Can we even test them properly? Unless I hear otherwise, I propose to remove the code next week. Sebb On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 14:33, sebb wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2023 at 12:31

[CRYPTO] Basic SSL 3.x support added

2023-11-08 Thread sebb
_flags This seems too easy, so I suspect there may be some missing tests. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [CRYPTO] Windows help finding OpenSSL library location

2023-11-05 Thread sebb
to the code to allow the alternate name to be used.] On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 01:28, sebb wrote: > > I don't currently have ready access to a Windows host, and have so far > failed to find the correct setting of jn[ai].library.path required to > cause OpenSSL to be loaded rather than the default

Re: [CRYPTO] Why does Makefile use CXX (C++) for linking?

2023-11-02 Thread sebb
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 10:12, Peter Hull wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2023 at 23:54, Alex Remily wrote: > > I believe it is for cross compilation, owing to the comments in the > > makefile: > > # for cross-compilation on Ubuntu, install the g++-mingw-w64-x86-64 package > I think you could also argue

[CRYPTO] Windows help finding OpenSSL library location

2023-11-01 Thread sebb
path works for both JNI and JNA on macOS; I expect this will also be true on Windows. Note: to build the code, I've found the quickest is to use: mvn [clean] test -DskipTests This ensures the native files are built. Sebb

[CRYPTO] Which native builds are supported in binary releases?

2023-11-01 Thread sebb
be generated from source. So: what determines which combinations are supported in the binary, and where is this documented? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [CRYPTO] Why does Makefile use CXX (C++) for linking?

2023-11-01 Thread sebb
e from multiple machines to get macOS, Linux, and > Windows binaries correctly compiled, linked, and packaged up. I hope > nothing was broken in all the recent commits. I think there may need to be some more GH tests to check all the combinations. > Gary > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2023, 8:4

[CRYPTO] Why does Makefile use CXX (C++) for linking?

2023-11-01 Thread sebb
(and especially docker builds) if C++ could be dropped. But perhaps there is a good reason for using C++ for this step only? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

[CRYPTO] GH macOS and Windows tests don't use OpenSSL crypto library

2023-10-30 Thread sebb
It looks like the macOS and Windows tests do not actually use the OpenSSL crypto library. Instead, they use the LibreSSL library which is bundled with the system. What do we want to do about this? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail

[CRYPTO] Website shows old test results (1.1.0, not 1.2.0)

2023-10-30 Thread sebb
these combinations? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [CRYPTO] Drop support for OpenSSL < 1.1 ?

2023-10-30 Thread sebb
e. In short, I would be in favor of dropping legacy > > OpenSSL support in the next commons crypto release. > > > > Alex > > > > On Sun, Oct 29, 2023 at 9:15 AM sebb wrote: > > > > > There is quite a lot of Crypto code that depends on the check: > > &

[CRYPTO] Drop support for OpenSSL < 1.1 ?

2023-10-29 Thread sebb
There is quite a lot of Crypto code that depends on the check: if (dlsym_OpenSSL_version_num() < VERSION_1_1_X) where VERSION_1_1_X = 0x1010; Dropping such support would simplify the code. Is there any need to continue to support such old versions? S

[ALL] parent uses commons.encoding=iso-8859-1; change to UTF-8?

2023-10-27 Thread sebb
As the subject says - it seems wrong to be using iso-8859-1 these days as the default encoding. Thoughts? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h

Re: [ALL] README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md

2023-10-25 Thread sebb
Hub users, like myself. I > really like having at least all top level type of information in the Readme > such that the repository presents itself as nicely as possible. In which case, I suggest we merge the parent POM into every component, to save having to look it up. > Gary > > On W

Re: [GH] (commons-logging): Workflow run "Java CI" failed!

2023-10-25 Thread sebb
t (triggered by asfgit). > > > > Head commit for run: > > e4d68bb37071db1e871a71634d0c535945b96484 / Sebb > > Standardise on verify goal > > > > Report URL: > > https://github.com/apache/commons-logging/actions/runs/6642985893 > > > > With regards, > > GitHub Act

Re: Move Proxy to dormant?

2023-10-25 Thread sebb
pr 27, 2021, 07:16 sebb wrote: > > > I propose to move Proxy to dormant later this week unless anyone steps > > up to fix the website etc. > > > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 18:13, sebb wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 00:35, Matt Benson wrote

[ALL] README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md

2023-10-25 Thread sebb
not clobber an existing entry. CONTRIBUTING.md should be a link to a shared file (as is done with SECURITY.md). [It's now very easy to update the main site, so I think the contributing info should be stored there.] Sebb

Re: [ALL] Dormant components and projects.a.o

2023-10-24 Thread sebb
f work to have a separate Dormant section on the site, and anyway dormancy only applies to a few projects (possibly only Commons). Does not seem right to make PMC-specific changes. But I'm doubtful that it makes sense to continue to publish details of dormant components on projects.a.o. Sebb

[ALL] Dormant components and projects.a.o

2023-10-24 Thread sebb
I've updated the DOAPs for dormant components to add a (Dormant) suffix. However, I wonder if it might not be better to drop the components from projects.a.o? Note that most of the dormant components are not in projects.a.o as they do not have DOAPs. Sebb

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

2023-10-24 Thread sebb
Done On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 14:40, Rob Tompkins wrote: > > +1 > > > On Oct 21, 2023, at 7:46 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > Seems reasonable to me. > > > > Gary > > > > On Sat, Oct 21, 2023, 6:49 PM sebb wrote: > > > >>

[ALL] HEADER and README html links on release distribution site

2023-10-22 Thread sebb
file has to be updated for each release, viz. the README.html file The only exception is daemon, which has a binaries/windows directory with its own files. The links had been replaced under some components, but these have now been corrected. Sebb

Re: [JEXL] issue with publication of Jexl 3.3

2023-10-22 Thread sebb
On Tue, 17 Oct 2023 at 22:16, sebb wrote: > > Something went wrong with the publication of the dev staging files from > 3.3-RC2. > > The commit [1] should have included the 6 HEADER.html and README.html > files from the staging site, however these were left behind, e.

Re: [JEXL] JexlFeatures exposes internal flag representation

2023-10-22 Thread sebb
. (The solution was to use a getter for the constant) Best to only expose constants that truly are constant, and also only to expose constants that need to be exposed. Sebb See for example: https://forums.oracle.com/ords/apexds/post/final-variable-inlining-why-2465 On Sun, 22 Oct 2023 at 07:12

[JEXL] JexlFeatures exposes internal flag representation

2023-10-22 Thread sebb
to maintain, so ideally don't expose constants unnecessarily. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[ALL] anyone use #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
Build-Plugin adds a link to #apache-commons IRC channel on irc.freenode.org Do we still use IRC, and if so, is it on freenode.org? Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: [DISCUSS] - Move commons-chain to dormant?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
Reviving this thread. I think we should now change chain to dormant. Sebb On Sun, 8 Oct 2017 at 16:10, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > > Looks like Apache Tiles 3 does not use commons-chain. > > The only mention of commons-chain I could find in > https://github.com/apache/t

[ALL] Why run scorecards and CodeQL weekly?

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
to the source? Alternatively, drop the push/pull trigger and only trigger weekly (although that would be overkill for the less active components) Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: [ALL] Java CI badge does not agree with workflow status

2023-10-21 Thread sebb
/commons-weaver/actions/workflows/maven.yml It looks like the original badge URL does not get updated sometimes. I fixed the template to use the URL as provided by GH itself. On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 22:42, sebb wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 17:35, Alex Herbert wrote: > > &g

Re: [ALL] Java CI badge does not agree with workflow status

2023-10-20 Thread sebb
cs/actions/workflows/maven.yml/badge.svg > > So try a badge update with a different URL. It seems the build-plugin template is wrong, and needs to be fixed. > Alex > > > > On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 16:03, sebb wrote: > > > > The build-plugin readme shows a failing J

Re: [JEXL] intended thread safety of JexlFeatures and JexlPermissions

2023-10-20 Thread sebb
o be thread-safe, because it takes its own copy which is stored in a final field as part of construction. That should ensure the mutable fields are published safely. Of course if changes are made subsequently to the copy, that would change matters. If JexlFeatures were immutable there would

[JEXL] intended thread safety of JexlFeatures and JexlPermissions

2023-10-20 Thread sebb
in detail. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[ALL] Java CI badge does not agree with workflow status

2023-10-20 Thread sebb
if it is stale. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[JEXL] issue with publication of Jexl 3.3

2023-10-17 Thread sebb
not work, as I thought most of it was now automated? AFAICT the rest of the commit was OK. Sebb [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/oowy3bq41zncsdbns4yxslknr8r2dmbn [2] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/jexl/3.3-RC2/binaries

Re: [Dbutil] Java 8 -> 11

2023-10-15 Thread sebb
On Sun, 15 Oct 2023 at 15:37, Elric wrote: > > On 15/10/2023 16:31, Gary Gregory wrote: > > A major version bump is rather heavy handed when no one is asking for a > > "real" 2.0 with breaking changes. > > Agreed. My 2 cents: a minor version and a clear release note is plenty. > Critical bug

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-10 Thread sebb
' because it makes maintenance and > eyeballing straightforward without requiring Maven-foo. That should actually be: mvn --show-version --batch-mode --no-transfer-progress If every workflow used the same prefix, people would soon get used to it. > Gary > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 8:45 

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-10 Thread sebb
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 13:05, Gary Gregory wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 7:50 PM sebb wrote: > > > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 18:52, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > The default goal is always used by GitHub builds > > > > Are you sure

Re: [WEAVER] - move to dormant?

2023-10-10 Thread sebb
ecurityManager whatsoever, I'd personally > > > prefer to fix [weaver], but having made my preference known I will defer > > > to > > > the consensus of the community. > > > > > > Matt > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 10:

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-09 Thread sebb
s executed, > > right? So if I say “clean” was the default, “mvn test” would not mean “mvn > > clean test”, right? > > > > Phil > > > > > On Oct 8, 2023, at 7:11 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > > > There are currently lots of variations of the defaultGoal

[WEAVER] - move to dormant?

2023-10-09 Thread sebb
on Java15+ with: IllegalArgument Unsupported class file... Download stats show almost no traffic over last 3 months: https://infra-reports.apache.org/#downloads=commons/weaver What traffic there is looks like it comes from bots. Sebb

[BUILD] plugin assumes default branch is 'master'

2023-10-09 Thread sebb
The build plugin currently assumes that the default github branch is 'master'. The references in text can be addressed, but there is also a reference in the URL for the CodeCov badge. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-08 Thread sebb
lean > test”, right? The default goal is only used if you don't provide a goal. > Phil > > > On Oct 8, 2023, at 7:11 AM, sebb wrote: > > > > There are currently lots of variations of the defaultGoal in different > > components. > > > > It may be

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-08 Thread sebb
only reason to put stuff in CP. We also put stuff in CP so component POMs don't need to be updated when defaults change. > Gary > > On Sun, Oct 8, 2023, 12:05 PM sebb wrote: > > > On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 15:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > > > >

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-08 Thread sebb
(verify includes test and package) Looks like there is some consensus for: clean verify -- plus -- apache-rat:check checkstyle:check japicmp:cmp javadoc:javadoc pmd:check spotbugs:check I think these should be optional: pmd:cpd-check revapi:check On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 17:04, sebb wrote

Re: [ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-08 Thread sebb
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 at 15:38, Gilles Sadowski wrote: > > Le dim. 8 oct. 2023 à 16:11, sebb a écrit : > > > > There are currently lots of variations of the defaultGoal in different > > components. > > > > It may be sensible to establish a standard setting which

[ALL] Standardise Maven defaultGoal in components?

2023-10-08 Thread sebb
Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [ALL] Change to GitHub Workflow message subjects

2023-10-05 Thread sebb
the docs), I won't object. Sebb > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 11:43 AM sebb wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 17:25, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > > > > Should we use (VOTE) instead of [VOTE]? > > > > I doubt that is necessary. > > > > The GMa

Re: [ALL] Change to GitHub Workflow message subjects

2023-10-05 Thread sebb
o] e.g. [GitHub] [commons-pool]: Workflow run "Java CI" is working again! [GitHub] [commons-lang]: Workflow run "Java CI" is working again! Vote subjects include the component name in plain text. > Gary > > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 10:53 AM sebb wrote: > > > I d

[ALL] Change to GitHub Workflow message subjects

2023-10-05 Thread sebb
subjects have been adjusted to use (parentheses) instead of [brackets] so GMail should no longer merge mails from different components. Sebb - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e

Re: [ALL] pom.xml should not contain RM details

2023-10-05 Thread sebb
On Thu, 5 Oct 2023 at 00:13, Phil Steitz wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 1:26 AM sebb wrote: > > > > The properties are used by the release plugin. > > > > But since they are unique to the user, they do not belong in the shared pom. > > So they

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >