Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

. Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:37 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) I've been digging in a bit further. A few issues: * The 1.0/1.1 feature for a long line

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Henri, On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 21:05 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote: IllegalStateException thrown (as it's not a direct argument) when there's not enough width to possibly output things and remain in the width. I'll give it a short period for any discussion and spin off another release

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

long words it would not be an issue even though the output might look silly for a width of 2 or 3. Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:37 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2

RE: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

. Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 11:37 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) I've been digging in a bit further. A few issues: * The 1.0/1.1 feature for a long line is to output

RE: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 9:45 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) This is fixed. Now we need to decide what should happen when text is too large, do we simply output it or do we break it up. ie) in your test case Gary

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) This is fixed. Now we need to decide what should happen when text is too large, do we simply output it or do we break it up. ie) in your test case Gary, the codehaus url is longer than the space you provide to print it. Do you expect it to be cut up

RE: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Good news all around. Thanks Hen, Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:08 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) So committed. I thought it would be harder to implement it that way

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

if you wanted me to do this due to the missing pronoun ;) Thanks, Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:58 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) If I rollback the change from CLI

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 10:58 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) If I rollback the change from CLI-162, and comment out the testInfiniteLoop; your new test also infinite loops. So CLI-162 is a sign

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

, February 09, 2009 7:58 PM To: Commons Developers List Subject: RE: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2) I'll extract a unit test from our code and post a new ticket. Gary -Original Message- From: Henri Yandell [mailto:flame...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 7:10 PM

[VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Apologies for the revote. I've added a note to the release page to check the NOTICE file's copyright year. There should be no difference between the two other than the RC1-RC2 in the pom and the updated year in the NOTICE file. Tag:

Re: [VOTE] CLI 1.2 release (RC2)

Hi Henri, thanks for the Wiki update - I was just in the process to add a sentence about copyright year it when I saw your changes Cheers, Siegfried Goeschl Henri Yandell wrote: Apologies for the revote. I've added a note to the release page to check the NOTICE file's copyright year. There