Re: [collections] ChainedTransformer...

2009-06-08 Thread Matt Benson
to that provided in [collections] in [functor] and later deprecate the [collections] functors? -Matt --- On Sun, 6/7/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com Subject: [collections] ChainedTransformer... To: Commons Developers List dev

Re: [collections] ChainedTransformer...

2009-06-08 Thread James Carman
Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com Subject: [collections] ChainedTransformer... To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 10:22 PM All, I thought I'd check out the collections_jdk5_branch to see

Re: [collections] ChainedTransformer...

2009-06-08 Thread Matt Benson
The analogous class in [functor], btw, is CompositeUnaryFunction. -Matt --- On Mon, 6/8/09, James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com wrote: From: James Carman ja...@carmanconsulting.com Subject: Re: [collections] ChainedTransformer... To: Commons Developers List dev@commons.apache.org Date

[collections] ChainedTransformer...

2009-06-07 Thread James Carman
All, I thought I'd check out the collections_jdk5_branch to see if there was anything that I could tinker with. I decided to look into the functors, since that's what I'm mainly interested in. Immediately I noticed ChainedTransformer. It's declared as: public class ChainedTransformerT