Re: incubator-commonsrdf git commit: as pr #18, I think notification should only go to the mailing list (and the author of the commit, which is by default)

Ah, but we do: https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/incubator-commonsrdf/ However it doesn't build all branches nor pull requests, as this also deploys SNAPSHOTs. Perhaps a cloned job which enables pull request checking and any branches? See the config of https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job

Quad support (was: Experimental jsonld-java integration branch)

Right, different .equals.. And I don't think we would want to have hierarchical .equals as you show, that could lead to weird collection behaviour. Also the Quad should probably include the Graph IRI in its .hashCode() Perhaps Quad just happens to look like Triple, without the same interface (or a

Re: CommonsRDF + Any23 Integration

Hi Sergio, Your right, Any23 is Sesame-based. Has the Sesame community ever been approached regarding interest in developing a CommonsRDF-module? Thanks On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Folks, > I wonder where the integration possibil

Re: incubator-commonsrdf git commit: as pr #18, I think notification should only go to the mailing list (and the author of the commit, which is by default)

Hi Folks, On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 6:09 AM, < dev-digest-h...@commonsrdf.incubator.apache.org> wrote: > > > From: Stian Soiland-Reyes > To: dev > Cc: > Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 15:51:22 +0100 > Subject: Re: incubator-commonsrdf git commit: as pr #18, I think > notification should only go to the mail

Re: Experimental jsonld-java integration branch

On 04/04/16 16:15, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: This raises good questions about Quads which I think we should also think about - e.g. if we imply make a Dataset as a subclass of Graph, and Quad a subclass of Triple, then does .size() and .contains() relate to only the default graph or all the qu