Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Benson Margulies
I've been holding off on wading into this, but I think that some sort of an idea has jelled. I wonder about Google's statement of the mission. If Google's statement of the mission is: "Get smart students involved in open source," then we have one situation. If, on the other hand, it is more like "

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Kathey Marsden
On 4/23/2010 4:45 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote: On 4/23/2010 4:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: The ability to formulate a GSoC proposal and attract mentor(s) for it must be rewarded. If original just means not going for one of t

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 7:38 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote: > On 4/23/2010 4:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: >> >> The ability to formulate a GSoC proposal and attract mentor(s) for it >> must be rewarded. > > If original just means not going for one of the ideas  proposed by a mentor > for GSoC and explor

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Kathey Marsden
On 4/23/2010 4:14 PM, Rahul Akolkar wrote: The ability to formulate a GSoC proposal and attract mentor(s) for it must be rewarded. If original just means not going for one of the ideas proposed by a mentor for GSoC and exploring what's needed, including the issues in Jira and attracting a

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Kathey Marsden wrote: > On 4/22/2010 9:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: >> >> >>> >>> On the other hand, this has been the single criterion that has defined >>> successful students in Mahout (which is definitely l

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:49 AM, Kathey Marsden wrote: > On 4/22/2010 7:24 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: >> >> Original Ideas are good >> === >> >> Past experience has shown that if a student proposes their own idea and it >> is accepted the student is going to be strong. >> >> PRO

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Rahul Akolkar
+1 to all below. -Rahul On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > I'd like to make a few comments about issues that have arisen during the > evaluation process for GSoC. I'm going to give my opinion on each, please > treat this as lazy consensus - do speak up if you wish to disagr

Re: Reviewing the evaluation process

2010-04-23 Thread Kathey Marsden
On 4/22/2010 9:26 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Apr 22, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: On the other hand, this has been the single criterion that has defined successful students in Mahout (which is definitely less standards driven). In Derby and similar projects, I think that this c