Frameworks track?

Hi All I've just been having a look through the CFP list, and it seems from first glance like there's quite a few good framework related talks, including OSGi and CXF ones. I don't know enough to be sure though... Do we have anyone here who's an expert in that sort of area, who could volunte

RE: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

Yep, we have enough content for that. I was being conservative when calling it "cloud". I told Rich I'd do as many tracks as I can under that heading. We certainly have enough for containers, big data, etc. as separate tracks. However, from a marketing perspective they are also related. I want t

Re: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

On 02/17/2015 02:29 PM, Joe Brockmeier wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: >I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad >term;-) I see one problem here - which is, a broad term is hard to promote. I wouldn't expect "big data"

Re: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad > term ;-) I see one problem here - which is, a broad term is hard to promote. I wouldn't expect "big data" to fall under "cloud". Big data is a term in its

RE: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

At the moment I'm looking at probably 4 track days (that includes the already proposed container track) I hope to get this to you very soon (I'm about 60% done) - bit it seems this last fortnight has been full of new foundation announcements that are easting up all my time - sorry. Ross -

Re: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

Ah. I kind of missed that connection. Can you give me an idea of how many track/days you're expecting to take up? Also when I might see your draft track? Thanks. On 02/17/2015 01:13 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad te

Re: Barcamp at ACNA

Looks like LF's plan has space for BarCamp scheduled on Thursday. Thanks. On 02/17/2015 01:16 PM, jan i wrote: Hi Rich. ApacheCON is monday-wednesday, and there are no Cloudstack conference so do we still have Barcamp thursday or should be organize that in between ACNA ? I need to know, beca

Barcamp at ACNA

Hi Rich. ApacheCON is monday-wednesday, and there are no Cloudstack conference so do we still have Barcamp thursday or should be organize that in between ACNA ? I need to know, because of TAC (number of days for people to attend). rgds jan I.

RE: [ApacheCon] Big Data track?

I'll do this as part of my Cloud tracks (see why I chose such a broad term ;-) Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporation -Original Message- From: Rich Bowen [mailto:rbo...@rcbowen.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 10:10 AM To: dev Subject: [ApacheCon] Bi

[ApacheCon] Big Data track?

So ... is anyone going to step up to give us a Big Data track, or is there too much overlap with the Science track to make this meaningful? Given that this was a substantial portion of our content at the last two events, it seems critical that we call this out in our schedule. Help? Anyone? -

[ApacheCon] Business track?

Shane, are you able to find time to pull together a business track either from what's been submitted, or from solicited talks? -- Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com - @rbowen http://apachecon.com/ - @apachecon

Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?

Hi Rich, Please add the sender of this mail. Hadrian On 02/17/2015 12:56 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: On 02/17/2015 12:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: I've posted a spreadsheet in another thread. As mentioned in the other thread, please let me know if you need to be on the invite list. Send me the gm

Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?

On 02/17/2015 12:52 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: I've posted a spreadsheet in another thread. As mentioned in the other thread, please let me know if you need to be on the invite list. Send me the gmail address you'd like me to add. Thanks. --Rich People need to NOT TAKE THIS AS TALK ACCEPT

Re: ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

On 02/17/2015 12:48 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing This is read-only because it's not the authoritative source, but is a copy. There's some overlap between Content and Science. There's also some overla

Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?

I've posted a spreadsheet in another thread. People need to NOT TAKE THIS AS TALK ACCEPTANCE. Because it IS NOT. Last year we had enormous confusion because people took a DRAFT spreadsheet as final notice, and made plans accordingly. We definitely need better tools for this. --Rich On 02/17

ApacheCon Schedule spreadsheet

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1k6Fbr7ijMs2PJunN9lhsjq7NjnSXRCVXTJHAHRqWshc/edit?usp=sharing This is read-only because it's not the authoritative source, but is a copy. There's some overlap between Content and Science. There's also some overlap in the Community track. Please send comm

Re: Knowing which talks are already claimed by another ApacheCon track?

So, the trouble with this process last year was that there were 4 mutually contradictory docs floating around. On 02/16/2015 03:36 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: It's probably best we start an online doc somewhere... Microsoft Open Technologies, Inc. A subsidiary of Microsoft Corporat

RE: [ApacheCon NA 2015] Proposed tracks Community + Containers

We are in full alignment :-) Chances are ill use your track as is. Sent from my Windows Phone From: Joe Brockmeier Sent: ‎2/‎17/‎2015 5:38 AM To: dev@community.apache.org Subject: Re: [ApacheCon NA 2015] Pro

Re: [ApacheCon NA 2015] Proposed tracks Community + Containers

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015, at 02:01 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH) wrote: > Thanks Joe, if you don't mind I'd like to hold on the container track. > I'm putting together a larger group of "cloud" tracks and trying to weave > a narrative through the whole thing. This includes containers. The good > news