Re: No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-24 Thread William A Rowe Jr
For Trademark reasons, the ASF feather is out. A feather wouldn't be a horrible emoji although all I can think of it representing is tickle, heh. On May 24, 2016 6:52 PM, "Christopher" wrote: > This is a somewhat serious question (but only somewhat). > > Does anybody know what the process would

Re: No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-24 Thread Don Cunningham
Ok send to me to!!! 😇 On May 24, 2016 7:54 PM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: > Please, no. Emoji are a giant embarrassment to the UTC. Does the ASF > really want to lump itself in with the people demanding characters for > 'poop'? > > But if you insist, I can send you the process. > > > On Tue, May 2

Re: No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-24 Thread Christopher
Ha. Okay, then. I guess I was just surprised there wasn't a feather of some sort in the set already. I can understand if the ASF wouldn't want to petition for it, of course. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:54 PM Benson Margulies wrote: > Please, no. Emoji are a giant embarrassment to the UTC. Does the

Re: No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-24 Thread Benson Margulies
Please, no. Emoji are a giant embarrassment to the UTC. Does the ASF really want to lump itself in with the people demanding characters for 'poop'? But if you insist, I can send you the process. On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Christopher wrote: > This is a somewhat serious question (but only

No Unicode Feather?

2016-05-24 Thread Christopher
This is a somewhat serious question (but only somewhat). Does anybody know what the process would be like to petition for a feather (ASF or otherwise) emoji in unicode? Has anybody tried doing this?

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-24 Thread Tama oh
Happy to help 😊 > On May 23, 2016, at 21:28, Alex Harui wrote: > > On 5/23/16, 12:18 PM, "tamaonakah...@gmail.com" > wrote: > > Snip... > >> Members who receive a great deal of generosity during their growth are >> likely to pay it forward. > > I found your entire email (most of which I snip

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-24 Thread Tama oh
You're welcome! 😊 If there are other groups that come to mind, I'll add them! Tamao > On May 24, 2016, at 03:32, Sharan Foga wrote: > > Hi Tamao > > All I can say is ..Wow! > > Thanks for taking the time to put down your thoughts, observations and > general knowledge on this. I'm still takin

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-24 Thread Kay Schenk
On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > On 05/20/2016 03:02 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: > > Will the board consider it, is an appropriate question here? > > > > Community development activities have been delegated to the ComDev PMC. > There's no reason for the board to consider it. >

Re: Adding Missing wiki pages for projects!

2016-05-24 Thread Nick Burch
On Sun, 22 May 2016, Mark Thomas wrote: On 21/05/2016 04:02, Syed Gardezi wrote: I wanted to setup wiki pages for these projects. I wanted to ask what will be the minimal data/fields/entries/coloum_names that would be required for the wiki page of a project. That is more a question for wikipe

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-24 Thread Sharan Foga
Hi Tamao All I can say is ..Wow! Thanks for taking the time to put down your thoughts, observations and general knowledge on this. I'm still taking it all in - but it's clear to me that there are some opportunities out there that we can start looking into. Thanks also for the offer of help

Re: Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?

2016-05-24 Thread Sharan Foga
Thanks Nick. I do have karma and I've created a basic page that I'll continue to add my ideas to and summarise any action points that are in progress. Link is https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/Diversity+Strategy+Ideas Thanks Sharan On 23/05/16 23:44, Nick Burch wrote: On S

Re: ombudsman@ (was Encouraging More Women to Participate on Apache Projects?)

2016-05-24 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > ...We have options for phasing out president@, from simply using one of Ross's > personal addresses, to creating a dedicated alias of the ombuds(man)@ > variety... If I wanted to report something confidential I think I'd like to know ex