DMCA is hardly a panacea. While it does absolve us of copyright infringement
claims against services used in the production of releases, it does not help in
the slightest when it comes to releases themselves.That would make the whole
point of voting on them moot.
It's not urgent, not a new idea
Running to the board every time there is a lack of consensus about a candidate
is not appropriate governance at Apache. The fact that PMC members are
afforded certain RIGHTS, including the right to stop the train on a personnel
promotion, is an important aspect of maintaining proper checks and
vate@ instead?
Niclas
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Joe Schaefer
> wrote:
> > Roman,
> > I've been beating the archiving problem with president@ like a dead
> horse for the past week- what
> > on earth
ut letting people who want to fix this have a go at it without further
obstruction and obfuscation, Roman?
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:35 PM, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
Here is what Shane said:"Emails to president@ (as far as I can tell) go to an
alias which
forwards to Ross (and EVP, and p
on skills.
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:31 PM, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
Here was your reply to me when I first pointed out the deficiencies with
president@. So much for the difficult to understand flowery prose, you keep
changing your stripes with each passing hour:
On Thu, May 19, 2016
en lacking on this thread.
Shall we fork it into a separate thread to get a closure? Show original message
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> Here's what I wrote to you on members@ Roman:
>
> &
lligent conversation with you Roman when only one of us is
paying attention to what the other has said.
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik
wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
> Roman,
> I've been beating the archiving problem with
Roman,
I've been beating the archiving problem with president@ like a dead horse for
the past week- what on earth have you been reading to avoid that reality?
Furthermore, I doubt president@ has an associated qmail owner file, which means
any addresses listed in that alias that go to domains whos
Actually it's more about senders with strict SPF rules that the qmail owner
files will correct for. It would be particularly bad for such email to get
lost in transit.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:16 PM, Joe Schaefer
wrote:
Patch looks pretty straightforward Marvin. Howev
fully delivered.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer
> wrote:
>> ...We have options for phasing out president@, from simply using on
Personally I'd like to see the CoC addressed as well, particularly in regards
to the use of president@ as a potential reporting channel for abuse.
The CoC has been in place for a while now, and we have a rough guide from Ross
to indicate that president@ as a reporting channel is underused compare
More specifically, it is the exception rather than the rule that theASF
infrastructure actually directly deploys the latest software writtenby Apache
projects, so no there's really no devops being practicedin that way.
The infra team itself, as has been mentioned by others, has adopteddevops
pri
LGTM, but don't forget to update the www.apache.org homepageto base it on the
new stuff instead of the DOAP files.
On Friday, March 6, 2015 10:47 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)"
wrote:
+1 please do so :)
++
Chris Mattma
I've enabled DMARC munging here to allow myself
and Melissa to post deliverable messages. Contact
infrastructure@ if you feel strongly that this change
was unwarranted.
You can see the only visible impact of the change
right in this very message- my From: address has
an INVALID suffix. This howe
The problem with that is that we don't get
any of the benefits out of simplification
of our rulesets: namely more comprehensible
behavior out of the server when a commit
has been blocked and someone needs help,
and it doesn't imply that the org has made
any cultural shifts towards a more open infra
It's never been easier to get started with the CMS as an
anonymous contributor than it is right now:
http://s.apache.org/cms-anonymous-clone
Please pass this info along to other CMS based projects
to encourage contributors to install and use the CMS bookmarklet
and contribute directly to CMS
Python or Perl scripts are preferred from an infrastructure
standpoint, as we already have the skillset capable of managing
those types of works.
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 1:30:08 PM
> Subject: Re: Shared Calendars
]
@committers = rw
@svnadmins = rw
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:29:52 AM
> Subject: Re: Commit karma
>
> On 03/03/2011 14:24, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > Why not manage the site the way the
Why not manage the site the way the www site is managed and
open up commit access to all committers? You can restrict
actual publication to comdev folks.
- Original Message
> From: Ross Gardler
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, March 3, 2011 9:18:05 AM
> Subject: Re: Commit
at any
> suggestion of generic influence rejects to the point of offense, but the
> same writers assert that environmental effects are cast into immutable
> stone.
>
> Maybe women are just smarter and have figured out that they can get more
> money for less work in
p 16, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> > ...I think
> > we should remain open to future initiatives, even those that
> > present potential "corrective" biases which favor underrepresented
> > groups
>
> I agree with that.
>
&
- Original Message
> From: Bertrand Delacretaz
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 11:54:50 AM
> Subject: Re: [proposal] integrating wo...@a.o into an Apache code of practice
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> > ...I like the idea that A
Ping jerenkrantz as he has given several such presos.
- Original Message
> From: Tim Williams
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, August 2, 2010 5:43:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Presentations
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ross Gardler wrote:
> > On 02/08/2010 16:00, Isabel D
Gardler
> To: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, August 1, 2010 11:20:18 AM
> Subject: Re: Contributing positively to a meritocracy (was Re: [DISCUSS]
>[VOTE] roll wo...@a.o into d...@community.a.o)
>
> Thanks Joe.
>
> Ross
>
> On 01/08/2010 13:19, Joe Schaefer wrote:
> &
- Original Message
> From: Anjana G Bhattacharjee
> To: Ted Dunning
> Cc: dev@community.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, August 1, 2010 6:40:27 AM
> Subject: Re: Contributing positively to a meritocracy (was Re: [DISCUSS]
>[VOTE] roll wo...@a.o into d...@community.a.o)
>
> Hi Ted,
>
> Thanks
Lol. Identity management, gender, and mailing list
sociology are all interesting components of the proposal,
but they don't mesh at all with how we normally think
about these things.
Anjana, if you want to keep exploring the boundaries
of what is possible with respect to those ideas and
how they
- Original Message
> From: Serge Knystautas
> Cc: ASF Infrastructure ; fundrais...@apache.org;
> ASF Trademarks & Brand Management ; ASF DevCom
> ; ASF Marketing & Publicity
> Sent: Mon, March 22, 2010 6:54:19 PM
> Subject: Re: Request to create autoresponder for PRC mailing list
>
- Original Message
> From: Sally Khudairi
> To: Tony Stevenson
> Cc: ASF Infrastructure ; fundrais...@apache.org;
> ASF Trademarks & Brand Management ; ASF DevCom
> ; ASF Marketing & Publicity
> Sent: Mon, March 22, 2010 6:23:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Request to create autoresponder for P
28 matches
Mail list logo
