Running to the board every time there is a lack of consensus about a candidate
is not appropriate governance at Apache. The fact that PMC members are
afforded certain RIGHTS, including the right to stop the train on a personnel
promotion, is an important aspect of maintaining proper checks and
d?
Niclas
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Joe Schaefer
> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> > Roman,
> > I've been beating the archiving problem with president@ like a dead
&g
people who want to fix this have a go at it without further
obstruction and obfuscation, Roman?
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:35 PM, Joe Schaefer
<joe_schae...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
Here is what Shane said:"Emails to president@ (as far as I can tell) go to an
alias which
forwa
ntation skills.
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:31 PM, Joe Schaefer
<joe_schae...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
Here was your reply to me when I first pointed out the deficiencies with
president@. So much for the difficult to understand flowery prose, you keep
changing your stripes with each passing h
suggestions that so far have been lacking on this thread.
Shall we fork it into a separate thread to get a closure? Show original message
On Friday, May 27, 2016 10:26 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Joe Schaefer <joe_scha
ation with you Roman when only one of us is
paying attention to what the other has said.
On Thursday, May 26, 2016 8:25 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>
wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 5:20 PM, Joe Schaefer
<joe_schae...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> Roman,
> I'
Actually it's more about senders with strict SPF rules that the qmail owner
files will correct for. It would be particularly bad for such email to get
lost in transit.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 10:16 PM, Joe Schaefer
<joe_schae...@yahoo.com.INVALID> wrote:
Patch looks
delivered.
On Wednesday, May 25, 2016 9:00 PM, Marvin Humphrey
<mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:30 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Joe Schaefer
> <joe_schae...@yahoo.com.in
Personally I'd like to see the CoC addressed as well, particularly in regards
to the use of president@ as a potential reporting channel for abuse.
The CoC has been in place for a while now, and we have a rough guide from Ross
to indicate that president@ as a reporting channel is underused
LGTM, but don't forget to update the www.apache.org homepageto base it on the
new stuff instead of the DOAP files.
On Friday, March 6, 2015 10:47 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
+1 please do so :)
I've enabled DMARC munging here to allow myself
and Melissa to post deliverable messages. Contact
infrastructure@ if you feel strongly that this change
was unwarranted.
You can see the only visible impact of the change
right in this very message- my From: address has
an INVALID suffix. This
The problem with that is that we don't get
any of the benefits out of simplification
of our rulesets: namely more comprehensible
behavior out of the server when a commit
has been blocked and someone needs help,
and it doesn't imply that the org has made
any cultural shifts towards a more open
It's never been easier to get started with the CMS as an
anonymous contributor than it is right now:
http://s.apache.org/cms-anonymous-clone
Please pass this info along to other CMS based projects
to encourage contributors to install and use the CMS bookmarklet
and contribute directly to CMS
Python or Perl scripts are preferred from an infrastructure
standpoint, as we already have the skillset capable of managing
those types of works.
- Original Message
From: Ross Gardler rgard...@apache.org
To: dev@community.apache.org
Sent: Fri, May 20, 2011 1:30:08 PM
Subject: Re:
- Original Message
From: Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org
To: dev@community.apache.org
Sent: Thu, September 16, 2010 11:54:50 AM
Subject: Re: [proposal] integrating wo...@a.o into an Apache code of practice
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 5:45 PM, Sean Owen sro...@gmail.com
, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.com wrote:
...I think
we should remain open to future initiatives, even those that
present potential corrective biases which favor underrepresented
groups
I agree with that.
About women, I found this article very interesting
that environmental effects are cast into immutable
stone.
Maybe women are just smarter and have figured out that they can get more
money for less work in marketing?
On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Joe Schaefer joe_schae...@yahoo.comwrote:
Indeed, and on my birthday no less. Good read
- Original Message
From: Anjana G Bhattacharjee a.g.bhattachar...@gmail.com
To: Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com
Cc: dev@community.apache.org
Sent: Sun, August 1, 2010 6:40:27 AM
Subject: Re: Contributing positively to a meritocracy (was Re: [DISCUSS]
[VOTE] roll wo...@a.o into
18 matches
Mail list logo
