Re: Seoul Tajo Meetup

Great work all around, Hyunsik. Cheers, Chris ++ Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. Senior Computer Scientist NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov WWW: http://

Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Google Summer of Code 2013

;>>year. >>> Historically these were >>> the org admins. I was there last year as one of the org admins but I >>>would >>> have liked it if there >>> was one of the mentors as well because I missed some insights into the >>> actual men

Re: First draft of slides for ApacheCon

Hi Benson, Looking really good! You may consider adding a flow chart/diagram showing the Incubator process but other than that, I don't have any suggestions. Wonderful! Cheers, Chris On 2/16/13 10:54 AM, "Benson Margulies" wrote: >https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1XSqXy9rz-RDcE-P2cK7dE

FW: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Google Summer of Code 2013

Guys FYI. From: Carol Smith mailto:car...@google.com>> Reply-To: "gsoc-mentors-announce+own...@googlegroups.com" mailto:gsoc-mentors-announce+own...@googlegroups.com>> Date: Monday, February 11, 2013 11:02 AM To: "gsoc-mentors-annou...@goog

Re: Advice on inviting Apache insight to NSF SI2 meeting?

Hi Guys, Same goes for Apache OODT -- I think it will be a good tie in. Cheers, Chris On Dec 3, 2012, at 8:25 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: > Hi Jim, > > Its great to hear you will be able me make it. I am sure NSF will greatly > appreciate your perspectives. We will be happy to provide a case stud

Re: [ACK] Paul Ramirez for GSoC mentor

Guys, can someone approve Paul's request in Melange? Thank you! Cheers, Chris On Apr 5, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote: > Bumping for approval in melange. This has been been ACKed by Apache OODT PMC. > I believe today is the last day so I wanted to make sure I get approved. >

Re: [ACK] Paul Ramirez for GSoC mentor

ACK On Apr 4, 2012, at 11:26 AM, Ramirez, Paul M (388J) wrote: > I would like to be a mentor for Apache OODT PMC and am requesting silent > acknowledgement from Apache OODT's PMC. > > link_id = pramirez > > Thanks, > Paul Ramirez ++

Re: [Announce] Google Summer of Code 2012

Hi Guys, I'm willing to participate as a mentor for OODT, for Tika or for Nutch. I've also reached out to the dev lists of those communities asking if anyone else is interested in joining me. Cheers, Chris On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Luciano Resende wrote: > -- Forwarded message -

Re: Apache Extras Question

;t). But if they happen to > want to fork some of our org.apache.SuperThing code, and incorporate it > into their SuperStuff product, that's generally OK. > > Does that all make sense? > > - Shane > > Sorry for the delay, but I was really burnt out on policy issue t

Re: Apache Extras Question

gt; > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> I was talking with Greg, and I think I'm OK with org.apacheextras as >> the namespace. > > Thanks for your patience :-) I wasn't trying to discount your &

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Benson, On Dec 30, 2011, at 8:25 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > So, this leaves me with two questions: could comdev write a less > comprehensive set of verbs here within the existing board@ mandate? > And is there any point to a discussion on board@ about the starting > point of all this: comm

Re: Apache Extras Question

Benson, You honed in on PRECISELY the 2 points I was trying to make. Thanks for making them so succinctly. One thing I will comment on explicitly (read below): On Dec 30, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > There are two aspects of this situation that I want to highlight: > > First, the

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Ross, On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:21 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 30 December 2011 08:21, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) >> wrote: >>> I'm also of the mindset that the PMC should be the ones saying > > ...

Re: Apache Extras Question

On Dec 30, 2011, at 3:11 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > On 29 December 2011 20:29, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: If you are saying this is compatible with ALv2 ? Then why use Apache Extras instead of just the oodt SVN official repo in Ap

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Ross, On Dec 30, 2011, at 2:27 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: > [...snip...] > Nothing in that quote says "using Apache marks", furthermore later sections > prohibit the use of or marks. Therefore it would be a loophole if those > clauses were not there. The clauses in our terms need to be read in th

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Noirin, On Dec 30, 2011, at 12:21 AM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: > Chris, > > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) > wrote: >> Hey Guys, >> >> I was talking with Greg, and I think I'm OK with org.apacheextras as >> the names

Re: Apache Extras Question

30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hey Guys, > > I was talking with Greg, and I think I'm OK with org.apacheextras as > the namespace. > > It sounds like Noirin thought that was cool and so did Mark S. > Are folks here on ComDev cool with that namespace for our

Re: Apache Extras Question

hris On Dec 29, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: > Hi Nóirín, > > On Dec 29, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: > >>> >>> Mark Struberg had another concrete suggestion: kudos to him for proposing >>> using >>> org.apachext

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hi Nóirín, On Dec 29, 2011, at 9:21 PM, Nóirín Plunkett wrote: >> >> Mark Struberg had another concrete suggestion: kudos to him for proposing >> using >> org.apachextras.oodt (implied). I could live with that, but don't believe I >> (or anyone else) >> should have to. >> > > I strongly pref

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hi Dennis, On Dec 29, 2011, at 5:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Funny, your conclusion is exactly contrary to my reasoning. > > It strikes me that you are talking about extending the decentralized > governance of the org.apache.oodt.* namespace (i.e., the ability to add > branches and ne

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Christian, On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: >> [...snip...] >> >> To avoid that nuclear option, I proposed 2 concrete suggestions and even >> volunteered >> to work up a patch that implements the one with less sweeping change. IOW, I >> offered to put my money where m

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Dennis, On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:59 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Thanks Chris, > > Just one caution. I mentioned authority over namespaces, not authority over > Apache Extras. The question is what constitutes authorized use of additions > to the org.apache.* hierarchy for namespaces. O

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hi Dennis, Thanks for replying, comments below: On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > (2) for a conforming implementation of a type that is defined by an Apache > project This is the situation that the OODT PushPull plugins fall into. > > This is no different than if the

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Christian, On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:29 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 9:23 PM, Mark Struberg wrote: >>> If you are saying this is compatible with ALv2 ? Then why use Apache >>> Extras instead of just the oodt SVN official repo in Apache ? >> >> But that's exactly the

Re: Apache Extras Question

nsed sources but also others. Yeah, precisely. Thanks for getting what I was saying Mark! Cheers, Chris > > > > > - Original Message - >> From: Luciano Resende >> To: dev@community.apache.org >> Cc: >> Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2011 9:13 PM >> Subj

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hi Luciano, On Dec 29, 2011, at 12:13 PM, Luciano Resende wrote: >> >> Who asked to release the code? I just want an SVN to throw the code up at. >> If you look at oodt-pushpull-plugins [1], the LICENSE.txt file is ALv2. The >> code >> we wrote (in Java) is ALv2. The code includes a runtime Mav

Re: Apache Extras Question

(removing community@ from the CC list; aren't we trying to kill that thread?) Hi Ross, Thanks for replying. Comments below: On Dec 29, 2011, at 11:04 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: [...snip...] > > > > It's my understanding that anyone can start up a project at Apache Extras, > > in which case, if tha

Re: Apache Extras Question

Hey Mike, Thanks for your reply. I get the analogy. More comments below. On Dec 29, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > [...snip...] > You, as an ASF member and PMC chair are equivalent to the employee in > this scenario. Even though you are an ASF member or PMC chair, you > do not ha

Re: Apache Extras Question

(cc'ing dev@community and setting reply-to: header so that replies go there) Hi Mike, First off, thanks for replying. Comments inline below: On Dec 29, 2011, at 6:33 AM, Mike Kienenberger wrote: > I am not an official Apache member, but here's my take on it. > > The Extras project area is for

Apache Extras Question

(moving this thread over from commun...@apache.org, per Bertrand's suggestion) Hey Guys, I was reading [1] and I noticed item 3.1 and 3.2 stating that projects at Extras shouldn't use the org.apache namespace (e.g., if Java), and they shouldn't use the apache project name in their extras name.