o post-process it. Thanks!
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 12:26 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 October 2015 at 12:52, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> Rich already made it clear what would be the best improvement and gave
>> a specific example, but I'll put it in generic terms.
>>
&g
Rich already made it clear what would be the best improvement and gave
a specific example, but I'll put it in generic terms.
Show the current count of the PMC members and committers.
Show the last PMC addition and date.
Show the last committer addition and date.
That's also all I'm looking for as
I was hoping someone who was more knowledgeable would speak up.
I recommend reading through this thread and looking at the various
links as it deals with the same idea:
Subject: Project Visualization Tool...
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/community-dev/201504.mbox/%3CCALznzY42fB7bbvDvU
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
> So what do we do about all the rc1|rc2|rcx ,alphas, betas and Milestone
> ‘releases’ that are on our official mirrors right now?
>
> (Because they would have been voted on as a ‘’release’’ for the projects to
> put them there in the first pl
Velocity can generate a report from a template and a dataset, but
you'd still need something that can parse the original .dot files.
POI can both read and write documents, at least excel documents. I
haven't tried using it to parse or write a .docx file, but a quick
search should determine wheth
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
> I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
> that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
> intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP"
I noticed that the new reporter output now contains "LDAP" in a way
that makes it sound like "LDAP" is the project name. Is this
intentional? It seems awkward and unnecessary to have "LDAP" in
there instead of "PMC", and when I read the first report containing
that verbiage, I thought there was
You will want to resend this message to us...@tomcat.apache.org.
See this web page for complete instructions:
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html#tomcat-users
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 9:30 AM, wrote:
> Hello team,
>We are currently using Apache Tomcat 7.0.50 deployed with multiple web
> a
I believe Ross Gardler, our current president said it extremely well:
The Apache Way works because of our core principles of
consensus building within a meritocratic structure. We are not
a democracy, nor are we an oligarchy.
As Jim said, and this is true in the projects I
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> > Here's a better not-quite-so-hypothetical example. A project like
> MyFaces
> > has to pass the TCK testing suite provided by Oracle. We would not want
> > to allow unrestricted commit access by someone who did not
> > understand profoun
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> The board, and comdev, will say "here's how we think things should go",
> but there's a lot of room between a mature project like httpd, where
> someone has 20 years worth of information to read about how to get started,
> and a newer project
Have you read https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html?
As others have said, the idea is always to build consensus rather than
force a result. I guess I've been fortunate in that the projects in
which I've been most active have always been more interested in
consensus than individuals forci
On 3/12/2015 11:31 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
> The solution as described by Emmanuel and applied by Apache Directory
> project is a good one.
The community mailing list is certainly a reasonable place to discuss
this, but it's been discussed before. Note that If you're going to
bring a discussion h
The github pages I've worked on have all been in Markdown, so they're portable.
I also don't see any reason why we can't host pages elsewhere since we
control the source repositories.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)
wrote:
> Is it really necessary for our web pages
I'm a long-time CVS/SVN user (multiple decades), and I started using
git and github about a year-and-a-half ago for a non-ASF project
intermittently. While I like the parallel development paths,
merging, and speed that git provides, the integrated bug tracking,
code commenting, code browsing, and
exceptions and alternative rules.
>
> -- Lefty
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>> On 25.07.2014 14:44, Mike Kienenberger wrote:
>> > Inconsistent capitalization. I'd recommend changing titles to standard
>> > capita
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 12:26 PM, Rich Bowen wrote:
> * Read talk titles and abstracts - send me edits for grammar, clarity,
> spelling, whatever. Point out boring titles.
I started to go through and send you the full list of changes, but
then realized it'd be faster for you to make the changes d
I'm involved with another organization, Terasology --
http://terasology.org/, that submitted a GSOC proposal for the second
year in a row. According to the six Terasology representatives at
the GSOC 2014 post-mortem IRC meeting with rejected organizations,
Terasology was denied this year mainly d
Thanks, Nick.
I wasn't subscribed to the mailing list when I sent the request
(oops), but I saw your response in the archives.
Forwarding to dev@community at Ross's request.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ross Gardler
Date: Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 9:10 AM
Subject: Re: Local Mentors
To: Mike Kienenberger
can you please send this to dev@community.apache.org I'm just out the
door, hopefully so
o provide you a loophole to do this.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
wrote:
> (cc'ing dev@community and setting reply-to: header so that replies
> go there)
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> First off, thanks for replying. Comments inline below:
>
> On Dec
21 matches
Mail list logo
