Rich is on point.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 3:23 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> 100% that.
>
> On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:31 PM wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 20:07 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > > I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out
> > > to per
> > > Apache
100% that.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:31 PM wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 20:07 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out
> > to per
> > Apache project to discuss collaboration around events, promotions of
> > our
> > projects, etc.
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 20:07 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out
> to per
> Apache project to discuss collaboration around events, promotions of
> our
> projects, etc.
>
> If the answer to the above is “write to their mailing list”
What's the problem with reaching out to the dev@ ? This is a great thing to
do.
I keep on explaining people when they reach me (or anyone else) directly
for help in any subject in Airflow that they are doing it wrong for three
reasons:
1) they do not let others, who feel like and are able to
I’d love to know who the specific people are that I should reach out to per
Apache project to discuss collaboration around events, promotions of our
projects, etc.
If the answer to the above is “write to their mailing list” or “everyone”,
etc, then no that’s not what I mean.
Without a single
I think the point is for the potential audience: "This group thinks that
this person knows enough about their product to explain it really well and
in an enjoyable way".
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 3:44 PM Jarek Potiuk wrote:
> Speaking of being ambassador - very much yes to do it, very much no to
Speaking of being ambassador - very much yes to do it, very much no to
"official status" of being one (since I was called by Rich).
IMHO. You are an ambassador or "evangelist" because you do it not because
you have a "title" to do it. There is absolutely no benefit or entitlement
of being
Adobe and other companies designate people as "evangelists" for their
various products. I see that often enough that I wonder whether it is a
more useful term in the software world than "ambassador", which carries
overtones of diplomatic negotiations.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 2:40 PM Matt Sicker
This sounds like info that can be on a project's website when listing
out the PMC and committers. Each person can add info about what they
do in the project.
On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 11:15 AM wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 16:43 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> > Yes, this is well established
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 16:43 +0100, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:
> Yes, this is well established and is not at all under scrutiny at
> all.
>
> What I’m suggesting is that the denotation of “advocate” (on top of
> or
> separate from alternative denotations) and a list of those friendly
> people
> who
Le ven. 13 mai 2022 à 17:44, Geertjan Wielenga
a écrit :
> ...What I’m suggesting is that the denotation of “advocate” (on top of or
> separate from alternative denotations) and a list of those friendly people
> who might want to collaborate in the outside non-code world might be nice
Yes, this is well established and is not at all under scrutiny at all.
What I’m suggesting is that the denotation of “advocate” (on top of or
separate from alternative denotations) and a list of those friendly people
who might want to collaborate in the outside non-code world might be nice.
Yes,
On Fri, 2022-05-13 at 22:57 +0800, Evil Cat wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> I know that Apache TLP currently has two roles of Committer and
> PMC,
> but I would like to ask if there is a role of promotion ambassador
> (event planning, community evangelism),
> although I know that Committer and PMC
Hi,
Le ven. 13 mai 2022 à 17:06, Geertjan Wielenga
a écrit :
>
> I like the idea because then I’d know who of the committers to reach out to
> around advocacy specifically instead of code...
One of my basic principles in ASF projects is to ask the project, not
specific people.
So in such a
I like the idea because then I’d know who of the committers to reach out to
around advocacy specifically instead of code.
Gj
On Fri, 13 May 2022 at 16:04, Tomasz Urbaszek wrote:
> Is such a role really needed? I know at least a few committers that were
> invited because they were
Is such a role really needed? I know at least a few committers that were
invited because they were "ambassadors". Those people usually helped with
organising project oriented conferences or did amazing community building
(getting new contributors not organising 10 s of meetups).
What would be the
Hi guys,
I know that Apache TLP currently has two roles of Committer and PMC,
but I would like to ask if there is a role of promotion ambassador (event
planning, community evangelism),
although I know that Committer and PMC also have such accusations, there seems
to be a clearer role
17 matches
Mail list logo
