I agree the core idea behind the Asf is contribute in a committ mode
Others should be added for different areas
Who are redflagged should be re grouped
Regards
Koti
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, 20:04 koteswara Rao Gundapaneni, <
koti.gundapan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I totally agree the knowledge
I totally agree the knowledge base is essential
Regards
Koti
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024, 19:28 potiuk (via GitHub), wrote:
>
> potiuk commented on PR #16:
> URL:
> https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1966599011
>
>If there are no more comments. I'd love to get
rbowen merged PR #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1966599011
If there are no more comments. I'd love to get this one merged and then
maybe others (I can do as well) add a bit more why`s for different areas. I
think also - when we have a
potiuk commented on PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1962324323
Ready for the next round of reviews.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501396031
##
wg-advisors/red-flags.md:
##
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules.
* Has a website external to apache.org
* Is missing reports
* Is
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501395596
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501395470
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501372589
##
wg-advisors/red-flags.md:
##
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules.
* Has a website external to apache.org
* Is missing reports
* Is
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501372091
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
potiuk commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501371159
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501326585
##
wg-advisors/red-flags.md:
##
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ not a policeman enforcing the rules.
* Has a website external to apache.org
* Is missing reports
* Is
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501325628
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
tisonkun commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501325488
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well defined
HI,
> An implicit +1 from the RM is not something that should be encouraged.
I agree, but some projects still do it.
> Also the minimum length of time for voting is 72 hours, except for
> urgent security-related releases.
A few projects have longer times for voting, so they still fit within
On Sat, 24 Feb 2024 at 00:53, justinmclean (via GitHub) wrote:
>
>
> justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
> URL:
> https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501297317
>
>
> ##
> wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
> ##
> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
> +#
justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501297317
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well
justinmclean commented on code in PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#discussion_r1501296133
##
wg-advisors/why/why_release_process.md:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+# Release process
+
+## Summary
+
+ASF project release software following a well
potiuk commented on PR #16:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16#issuecomment-1961978300
> Interesting idea. Yeah, I like this. It also gives us something to point
to when projects push back, in a "this isn't personal, it's just the way things
are" kind of way.
potiuk opened a new pull request, #16:
URL: https://github.com/apache/comdev-working-groups/pull/16
I would like to propose the "why" folder, where we will keep a (very) short
summary about some of the rules and policies that we will be - as Advisors -
discussing with the projects we will
20 matches
Mail list logo
