Great thanks !
On 10/02/13 20:02, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Done and done.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Yaniv De Ridder yderi...@adobe.com
wrote:
Thanks,
You can check the comments in jira and in the pull request. Let me know
if
you need something from me :)
/yaniv
uuu, thought I had fixed that. should be working now. (its all
dave's fault!)
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams
to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
http://brianleroux.damn-u-dave.jit.su/
Best ever failure message in a URL though ;)
I gathered it was his fault from the domain name.
On 11/02/2013, at 8:48 PM, Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
uuu, thought I had fixed that. should be working now. (its all
dave's fault!)
On Sun, Feb 10, 2013 at 11:04 PM, Tommy-Carlos Williams
to...@devgeeks.org wrote:
The only case (as Brian mentions) is not allowing the whitelist to be set
at runtime.
Also - does the app have to reset if a setting that was read at runtime
was changed? ie we probably need a configchanged event/notification or
something. For example, BackupWebStorage in iOS, etc.
On Sun, Feb
Hmm, yeah, definitely doesn't make sense for the whitelist. Not really for
BackupWebStorage either... If we're not saving across restarts, then
BackupWebStorage won't use the updated settings anyways.
Looking through the documentation, I think that most settings wouldn't have
a reason to
I'm not familiar with Chrome's API, but I believe that there is a
FileUtils API as well as the File Picker that Simon added a release
ago that fires an intent to pick a file if you have a file picker
installed. (Note: I don't use one, so it brings up the Gallery, Audio
Player and other things
Not sure about explicit methods since we will have more docs (and separate
ones for the diff platforms). I personally would go with a generic API, and
the setting to use would already be documented in the Project Settings doc.
e.g.
navigator.app.setConfigSetting('KeyboardShrinksView', false,
I'm not sure why a single generic api would mean less docs? We would still
need to document each valid key, wouldn't we? Anyway, I like the plugin
approach suggested, especially since there will likely be very few
configurations that need adjusting at runtime.
(btw, another adjustable setting
Regarding less docs: okay I see now Shaz, we use the same key names as we
have in configurations, and so we defer to the documentation there. Makes
sense. Should we then have a separate section/attribute for run-time
adjustable config values?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Michal Mocny
You're right about the FileUtils API, but I need a Cordova File object to
access those methods. input type=file yields a native File object, so,
for instance, I can't use FileWriter with it. Native File objects also
don't have full paths, which are useful (eg. for FileTransfer.upload, which
Check out some code I wrote in a side project that can do it.
https://github.com/macdonst/corinthian
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Max Woghiren m...@google.com wrote:
You're right about the FileUtils API, but I need a Cordova File object to
Hey gang,
So it appears I forgot to push out a commit to update the version number
in the BlackBerry repo, but accidently tagged 2.4.0 anyways. Should I force
re-tag the repo?
Also, the download on phonegap.com for the BlackBerry repo was kinda messed
up anyways. In that the robson tool didn't
Since it's a low risk change (version number only), I say re-tag, and
re-package - who is in charge of the robson tool? File a bug against it
Or is the version number not worth it?
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Tim Kim timki...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey gang,
So it appears I forgot to push out
both requests have been merged.
From: markus.leutwy...@hp.com
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Tagging 2.3.0rc2?
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 10:35:12 +
Hi Herm,
I have 2 pull requests to put into Cordova webOS 2.5.0rc1
https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/7
Tim, has anyone reported this or are you the only one who has noticed?
(if the latter, I say we re-package, if the former we should probably
do a retag =(
On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Since it's a low risk change (version number only), I say re-tag, and
Hey all:
I submitted a pull request for an enhancement of the addition of a merges
folder/concept into the cli build process.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/3
The concept of merges is pretty simple, to support a common core web base
across platforms, but allow for deploying
16 matches
Mail list logo
