Update from my IRC #asfinfra chat:
Apache has a strong stance that the domain must be project.apache.org [1].
Custom domains can be used but must redirect to the original domain and
cannot mask the original domain. Also, custom domains cannot contain the
word "apache".
There are precedents where
No reliance on null in WP7+8 or Windows 8.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Gord Tanner wrote:
> I noticed a bug when working on Ripple in Compass Heading:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commitdiff;h=6133a7e05bcd2ddc4a15591cf79cda965cbaf1ab
>
> When any of these v
+1 on the release.
Marcel: I actually think that it's healthy to have so many known bugs
reported in the project, since it shows that we actually know what's
going on and that the project is actually active. I consider the bug
count to be relatively low. Also, I'm glad we don't have bugs like
thi
Marcel: I think the bookkeeping has become a little messy.
Joe/Simon: As to why release, in 'release train philosophy' we attempt to
follow a version number is a cutoff indiscriminate of features. The reason:
we don't want to couple marketing events, and worse, to releases. Sometimes
this means we
Nice! Thanks.
-- Marcel
On Feb 14, 2013, at 1:04 PM, Jesse wrote:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=4f39f4f221156d11bbfda6123acb9803937c3eaf
>
Something I've noticed is the default graph on Jira is showing a widening gap
between open and closed issues, basically wider than it has ever been. Looks
like there are 140 unresolved bugs (compared to 60 unresolved improvements, 59
feature requests, and 57 subtasks). Leaving users a bad qualit
Yeah, what features or bug fixes are the driving force for 2.5.0 being
out at the end of the month?
Simon Mac Donald
http://hi.im/simonmacdonald
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> So, are we having a release just to have a release? I'm OK with that,
> but a lot hasn't happened
So, are we having a release just to have a release? I'm OK with that,
but a lot hasn't happened between 2.4.x and this release so far.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> +1
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> We have been lagging a b
+1
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 12:52 PM, Steven Gill wrote:
> Hey Guys,
>
> We have been lagging a bit behind on our usual release at the end of the
> month cycle. I'd like for us to push to get 2.5.0 out at the end of the
> month to get us back on track. How do people feel about aiming to get 2.5.0
Hmm, yeah, I didn't notice this on the first pass, but the settings
parameter refers to plugin-specific settings. This is always nil, and was
probably broken when we moved to an xml file for config. None of our core
plugins use it, so I'll just delete it at this point.
pluginInitialize sounds fine
I doubt any plugins use the initWithWebView:settings: selector at all,
might be legacy stuff in there that needs to be weeded out.
Let's deprecate them and use two-phase initialization. pluginDidInitialize
to me implies a notification-like method, how about pluginInitialize
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 a
There was an issue opened in JIRA a while ago where someone on a Samsung
phone preferred using it for whatever reason.. that¹s all I remember
On 2/14/13 10:53 AM, "Joe Bowser" wrote:
>Recently there's been numerous bugs open with half-working fixes on
>our Geolocation Polyfill. The thing is that
Recently there's been numerous bugs open with half-working fixes on
our Geolocation Polyfill. The thing is that I don't understand why we
have this still when we have the browser's geolocation. If ours was
better, or was non-spec, or just didn't suck, I'd understand that, but
ours fails the same w
Sounds great, thanks for coordinating.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Filip Maj wrote:
> I'll set up a doodle for early to mid-march and post it back to this
> thread.
>
> On 2/14/13 10:03 AM, "Jesse" wrote:
>
> >Good.
> >
> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> >
> >> So Ani
So I've written up my plan for attacking this problem into a Google Doc
I've shared for public comments:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fhwnIZ5TqwklGx71pLmfSghysls1S4_5ktEsjA9ac5Y/edit?usp=sharing
tl;dr version is that on cordova prepare (the new fast first part of
cordova build, copies www)
Yea, I'll jump into the IRC channel today. I thought I'd check here in case
anyone has some magical wiki links about it.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> Ask infra? I'm afraid of what they'll say but probably have to do it.
>
> On 2/13/13 10:32 PM, "Michael Brooks" wrote:
>
>
The iOS plugin guide doesn't mention init methods for plugins. We should
fix this...
But first, how...
Right now we have:
- (CDVPlugin*)initWithWebView:(UIWebView*)theWebView
> settings:(NSDictionary*)classSettings
> {
> self = [self initWithWebView:theWebView];
> if (self) {
> s
I'll set up a doodle for early to mid-march and post it back to this
thread.
On 2/14/13 10:03 AM, "Jesse" wrote:
>Good.
>
>On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
>
>> So Anis and I were thinking of, at the minimum, doing a 10-15 min
>>overview
>> of the tools we each work on (cordova
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-js.git;a=commit;h=4f39f4f221156d11bbfda6123acb9803937c3eaf
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Jesse wrote:
> This is good enough. That was my oversight.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Marcel Kinard wrote:
>
>> I was contacted by someone u
Good.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Filip Maj wrote:
> So Anis and I were thinking of, at the minimum, doing a 10-15 min overview
> of the tools we each work on (cordova-cli and plugman) and then fielding
> questions.
>
> We can also bring up main points for and against considering an app bei
So Anis and I were thinking of, at the minimum, doing a 10-15 min overview
of the tools we each work on (cordova-cli and plugman) and then fielding
questions.
We can also bring up main points for and against considering an app being
a plugin and see where that gets us.
I am thinking of setting up
Ask infra? I'm afraid of what they'll say but probably have to do it.
On 2/13/13 10:32 PM, "Michael Brooks" wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The domain renewal for cordova.io is due in March 2013.
>
>How do other Apache projects manage custom domains? I've searched around
>apache.org without much luck.
>
>Dur
I agree with Shaz—in general we should start using this type of syntax for
dictionaries:
return @{@"CDVType": @"Multipart", @"messages": messages};
I'd say messageAsMultipart: makes sense, in keeping with the pattern set by
the other names.
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Michal Mocny wrote:
And also: do we like the name "messageAsMultipart:" or should it just be
"messageWithArguments:"?
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Michal Mocny wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> Yes I was definitely thinking the same thing, but wanted to do that later.
> I'll make the change before documenting how multipar
Andrew,
Yes I was definitely thinking the same thing, but wanted to do that later.
I'll make the change before documenting how multipart messages work, as
shaz suggested. Thanks for giving me a heads up about reference to it on
android. Also: other platforms dont use it?
-Michal
On Wed, Feb
25 matches
Mail list logo
