Re: camera saveToPhotoAlbum intent

2013-04-08 Thread Lorin Beer
I'll look into the URI to photoAlbum. If not, I've issued a ticket for the image mutations: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-2958 - Lorin On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Jesse wrote: > Similarly, 2 writes are required on WP7 + 8 as well, since there is no > navigable url from the appli

Re: camera saveToPhotoAlbum intent

2013-04-08 Thread Jesse
Similarly, 2 writes are required on WP7 + 8 as well, since there is no navigable url from the application to the camera-roll. @purplecabbage risingj.com On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Becky Gibson wrote: > Yeah, saveToPhotoAlbum was an iOS only option for awhile. It got lost for > a bit du

Re: camera saveToPhotoAlbum intent

2013-04-08 Thread Becky Gibson
Yeah, saveToPhotoAlbum was an iOS only option for awhile. It got lost for a bit during the unified JS push last year but I added it back in April, 2012.The photo was only saved to the photo album when this variable is set but it did result in two copies of the file in order to have a URL to re

Re: Unifying the config.xml

2013-04-08 Thread Gorkem Ercan
Can we possibly proceed with this PR? Is there anything that I need to do on my part? -- Gorkem On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Gorkem Ercan wrote: > Great! PRs are updated with the suggested changes > -- > Gorkem > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 11:36 PM, Andrew Grieve wrote: > >> Yep, sounds good

Re: File Transfer is failing in MobileSpec on Android.

2013-04-08 Thread Don Coleman
I restarted the nodejitsu server. Uploads appear to be working now curl --form upload=@foo.txt http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com/upload If you need the source for the server https://github.com/apache/cordova-labs/tree/cordova-filetransfer On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Max Woghir

Re: File Transfer is failing in MobileSpec on Android.

2013-04-08 Thread Max Woghiren
I'm getting a whole bunch of errors here, and visiting http://cordova-filetransfer.jitsu.com/upload in a browser yields a 404, so I suspect server problems. Can someone verify whether they're getting the same issues? On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > OK, things look good now.

RE: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Ken Wallis
To a degree I think the architecture has been simplified. Was not the Cordova APIs calling to WebWorks apis, which then hit native, whereas now we don't have the WebWorks layer? -- Ken Wallis Product Manager – WebWorks BlackBerry 289-261-4369 From: c

Re: Spam control in the Wiki

2013-04-08 Thread Jesse MacFadyen
+1, great idea. Cheers, Jesse Sent from my iPhone5 On 2013-04-08, at 8:19 AM, Shazron wrote: +1 I love this - how do we get it set up? On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > +1 > On Apr 8, 2013 3:32 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Chris DelCol
I think the biggest impact is that the architecture and features of Cordova are now implemented directly, rather than through a proprietary SDK that is "somewhat" aligned. I'm not sure there will be actual performance gains, or that the architecture is easier. But what it does mean is that compatib

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Michal Mocny
This sounds pretty cool. For those with no prior BB experience, is there a high level summary of the net effect of the changes? x% faster exec, N less bytes of binary, Y times easier plugin development etc? Thanks, -Michal On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Bryan Higgins wrote: > It's exactly t

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Bryan Higgins
It's exactly the same as this extension, but we've converted it into a cordova plugin. We'll provide both the source and pre-compiled libraries. https://github.com/blackberry/BB10-WebWorks-Framework/tree/master/ext/jpps On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Lorin Beer wrote: > sounds great Bryan, >

Re: Spam control in the Wiki

2013-04-08 Thread Shazron
+1 I love this - how do we get it set up? On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:03 AM, Simon MacDonald wrote: > +1 > On Apr 8, 2013 3:32 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Shazron wrote: > > > Any other better way? Right now I suppose the only way is to delete >

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Lorin Beer
sounds great Bryan, about the private native dependency, is that provided as a precompiled library? Can we run these codes? - Lorin On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Bryan Higgins wrote: > Sounds good! There are still a few things we need to finish up to get test > results in line with the exist

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Bryan Higgins
Sounds good! There are still a few things we need to finish up to get test results in line with the existing implementation. File API is the big one. There is also a native library needed which is in the private repo right now. We'll look at moving that into cordova-blackberry. On Mon, Apr 8, 20

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Lorin Beer
Great! Last week, I wrote a little script to provide unique tags to the unit tests in mobile spec. Once those are tagged, I'll be pushing up the currently failing tests in the existing BB10 implementation. Having those tests documented will hopefully provide an anchor to move the discussion forward

Re: Ch-ch-ch-ch-changes

2013-04-08 Thread Lorin Beer
Great to hear you'll still be around and contributing to Cordova, Gord! See you at PhoneGap Day in MLP cosplay? On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:27 AM, Michal Mocny wrote: > (turn and face the strain) > > Change is good, right? Glad to still see you sticking around. > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:27 P

Re: BlackBerry BB10 Repos on GitHub

2013-04-08 Thread Bryan Higgins
I'll follow up today with that. There are a few people who need to sign still. On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 6:32 PM, Lorin Beer wrote: > This is great stuff! I figured we'd be waiting for a while longer, great to > see this go live! > Tim and I will be going through this right away. > Bryan, I know y

Re: Spam control in the Wiki

2013-04-08 Thread Simon MacDonald
+1 On Apr 8, 2013 3:32 AM, "Jukka Zitting" wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Shazron wrote: > > Any other better way? Right now I suppose the only way is to delete each > > page manually. > > Instead of blacklisting users or spammy content, we could switch to > explicitly whitel

Re: Spam control in the Wiki

2013-04-08 Thread Jukka Zitting
Hi, On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 AM, Shazron wrote: > Any other better way? Right now I suppose the only way is to delete each > page manually. Instead of blacklisting users or spammy content, we could switch to explicitly whitelisting users who request access to the wiki. See: http://wiki