Ship it. Also remember dependences can be version locked w npm so releases not interdependent. Let's ship as often as possible and consider the 'once a week' thing a minimum. (Unless there is nothing to ship.) On Nov 8, 2013 10:51 PM, "Steven Gill" <stevengil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am going to release 0.15.0 of plugman today, but not set it to latest on > npm until 3.2.0 is out. This will allow us to use 0.15.0 version in our RC > testing. > > I am also going to publish CLI version 3.2.0-0.0.0 (is that a good version > number for rc?) and also not set it to latest on npm. This version will be > using 3.2.0-rc1 version of platforms. We can test this for a few days and > then update to 3.2.0-0.1.0 to go along with 3.2.0 release. > > Sound good? > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I would say 3.2 is less than a week away. If you want to release both > > tools today, I am fine with that. I would just hope that both tools get > > tested on windows/mac before release. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Braden Shepherdson <bra...@chromium.org > >wrote: > > > >> There is one big, crippling bug in the released plugman: If you add a > >> capability with Xcode 5, you can no longer plugman.prepare, and > therefore > >> not rebuild your app. > >> > >> I don't think releasing them separately is a good idea. I'm prepared to > >> wait until 3.2 to release both, but only if that's less than a week > away. > >> Otherwise I propose releasing both today, targeting 3.1 still, and then > we > >> can do another release with Cordova 3.2. > >> > >> Josh, we can do a release of just the tools whenever they're ready, so > >> there's not much to be gained by spending an extra week fixing a dozen > >> more > >> bugs. We might as well release now, fix more bugs, and release again > next > >> week. > >> > >> Braden > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Steven Gill <stevengil...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > With 3.2 looming, it might be better to release plugman along with > 3.2. > >> > That way we don't tell our users to update now, and again when 3.2 > comes > >> > out. Unless of course the fix in plugman is critical. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > I was reminded of > >> > > http://wiki.apache.org/cordova/VersioningAndReleaseStrategy which > >> says > >> > it > >> > > is weekly, with cli and plugman together. Works for me. > >> > > > >> > > On Nov 8, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Marcel Kinard <cmarc...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > What is the trigger for doing a plugman release? As needed per > >> > > bugs/features, or should it be at the same time as cli? I'd suggest > >> the > >> > > latter, since cli has either a pseudo-dependency or real dependency > >> > > (depending on how you look at it) on plugman. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
