More for discussion than review.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/57/files
Clocks in at a disturbing 44kb so we clearly have room for optimization on
the baseline of our platform. (Not a criticism: an observation.)
I have a few questions for them whom are more familiar w/ cordova.js tha
Hi,
Can someone review the request ? Thanks in advance.
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugman/pull/37
Cheers,
Liyong
(apache reviews has a fairly poor UI/UX, but has some fairly useful
integration with JIRA and ML. Those benefits matter not for this patch.
Since on this aside already, does anyone know a way to sign up for github
emails for pull request code comments without getting spammed with one
email for ev
+1. Renderer makes more sense. :)
> -Original Message-
> From: mmo...@google.com [mailto:mmo...@google.com] On Behalf Of Michal
> Mocny
> Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 11:10 AM
> To: dev
> Subject: Re: Cordova and Crosswalk
>
> +1 to Renderer. I think that term is more applicable here
+1 to Renderer. I think that term is more applicable here anyway.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:13 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote:
> I like it but one small nit: we already use the term 'engine' to describe a
> downstream in plugins. Propose we call it 'renderer'.
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Jon
ok, for review
https://github.com/apache/cordova-app-hello-world/pull/4
(I'm not really a fan of the apache reviews / seems like a step backward to
me.)
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 7:02 AM, Josh Soref wrote:
> > I have been thinking about this,
> > is there a valid reason to have DisallowOverscrol
I like it but one small nit: we already use the term 'engine' to describe a
downstream in plugins. Propose we call it 'renderer'.
On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Jonathan Bond-Caron <
jbo...@gdesolutions.com> wrote:
> On Wed Dec 4 11:55 PM, Hu, Ningxin wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
>
