+1 for nuking data uris
On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Don Coleman <don.cole...@gmail.com> wrote: > I like the Camera API because it's simple. Capture might be standard but it > seems too complex. > > Resizing and orientation are important features. I never use data URLs. > What's going on in the standards bodies around image capture? Is there an > emerging standard that we could scope down to, or is nothing emerging and > we get to make it up in the meantime? > > I do like the simplicity of the camera plugin (roughly) just doing capture, > and pushing the utilities into a separate plugin (perhaps even non-core). I > hear that picture capture and uploading is a common pattern, so we should > consider the migration impact to existing users. > > On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Mike Billau <mike.bil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > How does this coincide with the recent thread about Camera vs Capture? > > Yeah, seems like these are part of the same big picture that should be > thought through simultaneously. >
