GitHub user kant2002 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/255
CB-7983 Indicate that volume up and volume down button events supported on
Android
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user kant2002 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/256
CB-5116: Fix links
Links to configuration description page fixed.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kant2002/cordova-docs
GitHub user kant2002 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/257
CB-8259 Report error when generation for language failed
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/kant2002/cordova-docs CB-8259
One more speed improvement and
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/257
After that I only improve speed by movign joDoc-js inside our generation
process, and start moving to Make-ish processing.
Right now generation speed almos doubled, so I could concentrate on
translation tools.
If no
GitHub user mdudek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/123
Fixed callbackFromNative
NO_RESULT status was resolved as failure. This bug is there from Oct 14,
2014.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user Hurtyto commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-contacts/pull/51#issuecomment-69142471
Sure. I will sign it as soon as possible then :)
-Original Message-
From: Jesse MacFadyen notificati...@github.com
Sent:
@Marcel
Thanks for feedback and don't worry you don't hurt me. What I want is to
improve translation, and
I want to double-check that any changes does not hurts in the final
results. So this would be a lot
of generation of ru-edge. I decide to take any low hanging fruit in the
generation speed,
Github user agrieve commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69129747
Merged! However - after a closer look at the unit tests, I highly encourage
you to try and refactor things so that the tests do not mock out private
methods within
I never test on gingerbread.
My opinion is that devs that really need it can just use older Cordova
versions, or can fight through the testing themselves. With multi-apk
support in the play store, you could even use a different version of
Cordova for gingerbread vs. ICS+
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at
GitHub user lingoer opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/124
[CB-8270] rename category methods for JSON handling with a prefix.
According to [Apple's
GitHub user mdudek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-js/pull/98
Fixed callbackFromNative method
NO_RESULT status was resolved as failure.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mdudek/cordova-js
Github user mdudek commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/123#issuecomment-69145160
Thanks for info. I will fix it there...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mdudek closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/123
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user agrieve opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/142
Link java files
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/agrieve/cordova-lib link-java-files
Alternatively you can review and
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/123#issuecomment-69112909
You cannot fix this here. cordova.js is the output of
https://github.com/apache/cordova-js
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Hey
So, 2015 is here, and we have the new Android Pie Chart:
http://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/index.html#2015
Due to two percentage points on ICS and three on Gingerbread, we're stuck
supporting these platforms for the near future, but it looks like we're in
the bad spot of them
+1
Tests:
- npm install -g cordova@rc
- Built and ran the default HelloWorld app on Android
- ran coho verify-tags
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
+1
* Confirmed sigs hashes with `coho verify-archive`
* Verified sha1s match tags with `coho
GitHub user cjpearson opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/20
update docs for StatusBarBackgroundColor
The default value is no longer black. (CB-7486)
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
It seems to me that if we are only going to drop *one*, that it should be
Gingerbread first, since it is a lower SDK version.
How can an app support GB and *not* ICS?
Having said that, I am also interested in the discussion of better numbers on
usage than just the Play Store (even if my gut
I'm just mentioning it because my only Android 4.0.3 devices are an ASUS
Transformer 2 tablet and a Motorola RAZR phone that did weird things to my
computer when I tried installing the extra software to upgrade it.
However, if we did deprecate 2.3, I can just flash 4.0.3 on the Nexus S and
use
Also, who actually tests on Gingerbread? Please comment on this thread.
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 5:09:49 PM Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just mentioning it because my only Android 4.0.3 devices are an ASUS
Transformer 2 tablet and a Motorola RAZR phone that did weird things to my
What's reviewboard?
j/k, yeah kill it!
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 1:13:55 PM Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Anyone still interested in using ReviewBoard? I feel like we gave it a
decent shot, but github pull requests are working better.
If no one objects, I'm going to delete the
Anyone still interested in using ReviewBoard? I feel like we gave it a
decent shot, but github pull requests are working better.
If no one objects, I'm going to delete the .reviewboardrc files from the
repos and update
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/blob/master/docs/code-reviews.md
GitHub user HirofumiTamori opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-vibration/pull/32
index.md(jp)
Correct Japanese Translation
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/201
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
GitHub user jsoref opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/201
CB-7950 CLI make CordovaCliCreate.prototype.run vaguely correct
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jsoref/cordova-cli cb_7950
GitHub user jsoref opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/202
CB-5316 Spell Cordova as a brand unless it's a command or script
* Change `cordova command` to `cordova-cli command` to match the rest of
the file
* Change `cordova library` to `Cordova
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/202
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
+1
* Confirmed sigs hashes with `coho verify-archive`
* Verified sha1s match tags with `coho verify-tags`
* Re-created archives to ensure contents match release candidate (did so
for cordova-js and cordova-cli)
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Please
Yeah, kill it. gh-pulls are much easier to review I think.
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
What's reviewboard?
j/k, yeah kill it!
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 1:13:55 PM Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org
wrote:
Anyone still
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69095149
@agrieve, have you had a chance to take another look at this ? --Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Hey
Do we have a 3.7.0 branch ready yet? I want us to get that ready and merge
the 4.0.x stuff into the master branch once we get 3.7.0 out. That way we
can finally go back to having a regular dev process.
Are people opposed to us merging the 4.0.x branch into master once we
release 3.7.x and
Thank you very much, it's fine after update your commit.
Is the mobilespec being tested for Cordova 4.0, Because there are still some
other issue such as the splash screen can't show in splashscreen manual tests.
-Original Message-
From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com]
I say we go 4.x all in and drop everything below. Time to draw a line.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015, 6:24 PM Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, who actually tests on Gingerbread? Please comment on this thread.
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 5:09:49 PM Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm just
!
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015, 6:49 PM tommy-carlos williams to...@devgeeks.org
wrote:
--
tommy-carlos williams
On 8 January 2015 at 12:37:59, Brian LeRoux (b...@brian.io) wrote:
I say we go 4.x all in and drop everything below. Time to draw a line.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015, 6:24 PM Joe Bowser
Those stickers are old! I don't go to Android conferences, sine Android
devs hate us these days.
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 5:53:04 PM Brian LeRoux b...@brian.io wrote:
!
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015, 6:49 PM tommy-carlos williams to...@devgeeks.org
wrote:
--
tommy-carlos williams
On 8 January 2015
I know they are old, but I have always wanted one, heh.
--
tommy-carlos williams
On 8 January 2015 at 12:54:24, Joe Bowser (bows...@gmail.com) wrote:
Those stickers are old! I don't go to Android conferences, sine Android
devs hate us these days.
On Wed Jan 07 2015 at 5:53:04 PM Brian
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/47
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/7
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/62
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/16
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/22
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user agrieve commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/51#issuecomment-69127345
What's the status of this. Leave open?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user agrieve commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/128#issuecomment-69127706
Think this looks good to me. If you're ready for it to go in, could you
attempt to rebase it ontop of master and squash your commits?
---
If your project is set up
GitHub user jsoref opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-blackberry/pull/179
CB-7807 Add BlackBerry10 platform to a project on any workstation OS
* Split init reqs checks out of init
* Consistently use CORDOVA_DIR (instead of occasionally using BIN_DIR)
GitHub user jsoref reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media-capture/pull/29
CB-7977 Mention deviceready in plugin docs
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-media-capture/pull/29
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user jsoref opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/258
CB-8261 Brand: BlackBerry
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jsoref/cordova-docs blackberry
Alternatively you can review and
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/258
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Yesterday I created an issue in JIRA
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-8253) intending to pick it up myself
and start working on it. But I find that I can't assign it to myself. Do I
need someone else to assign it to me or am I missing something obvious?
Thanks,
Alan
Github user purplecabbage commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-contacts/pull/51#issuecomment-69064486
Yeah, we can't accept the code without a signed CLA on file. It'll wait.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Went to try this out and decided it's a bad idea. Much better is to just
fix createmobilespec.js to use the proper platform versions when generating
the .js. I've done this and checked it in.
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
Hmm, I hadn't tried the key
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-cli/pull/195
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hmm, I hadn't tried the key event manual tests with 4.0.x in MS. I do think
that would break based on the version being MSTEST, since there is now code
to make an exec() to CoreAndroid based on the platformVersion.
Maybe let's just set the plugin bridge name back to App on 4.0.x so that
the js
Github user omefire commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-lib/pull/140#issuecomment-69056950
travis-ci failure not related to my changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
57 matches
Mail list logo
