Github user thehuijb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/83#issuecomment-94649473
Anyone had a chance to look at this yet?
I would appreciate any comments that help improve this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user dpolivy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/73#issuecomment-94885204
@stevengill Is there someone who can review and merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user dpolivy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/41#issuecomment-94884712
@purplecabbage Is that strictly necessary, given the code is quite
straightforward and fairly common? I'd love to get this merged in if possible.
+1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)
v-seg...@microsoft.com wrote:
I vote +1
* Performed manual ad-hoc testing
-Sergey Grebnov
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015
Github user muratsu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/88#issuecomment-94889877
Rebased and squashed - ready to merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user Nonsense331 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/19#issuecomment-94914549
This also fixed an issue i had where my app was crashing after taking a
photo using the cordova camera plugin. :+1:
---
If your project is set up
Need 1 more vote
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Parashuram N (MS OPEN TECH)
panar...@microsoft.com wrote:
+1 vote
* Verified signatures and hashes
* Verified tags
* Verified plugins added correctly to blank
* Verified blank app can be successfully ran and built for
* Ran smoke testing
Github user shazron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/4#issuecomment-94913693
Hi @Hirbod,
Please file a separate issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB. I
fear this will be buried in Github since it is already
Github user dpolivy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/49#issuecomment-94880942
@stevengill @shazron Is it possible to get a review on this and some
feedback on whether it is OK to merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user Hirbod commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/4#issuecomment-94915215
Is it enough when I just link to our conversation? Or do I need to paste
everything again there @shazron ? And thanks for your help!
---
If your project
I vote +1
* Performed manual ad-hoc testing
-Sergey Grebnov
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:16 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Plugins Release
Need 1 more vote
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:50 AM,
Github user dpolivy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-splashscreen/pull/42#issuecomment-94884271
@stevengill @purplecabbage @sgrebnov Is it possible to get someone to
review and merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user dpolivy commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/74#issuecomment-94885261
@stevengill Is there someone who can review and merge this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user agrieve commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/83#issuecomment-94831626
just went to have a look but the diff has changes that you didn't make in
it. Can you try rebasing?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Given the state of some of our plugins, dropping the distinguishing
namespace might be a good thing :P
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Horn, Julian C julian.c.h...@intel.com
wrote:
I am also against another rename. These name changes are very costly and
disruptive.
There is code in several
Github user brodybits commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/69#issuecomment-94813170
Withdrawn for reasons described in #68.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
I am also against another rename. These name changes are very costly and
disruptive.
There is code in several places that assumes that you can enumerate the
plugins selected by a project by enumerating the subdirectories of plugins.
If you allow a plugin root folder to be more than a single
Github user brodybits commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/68#issuecomment-94813044
Withdrawn. It is possible to configure an app to target Windows 8.1 in
config.xml. To completely remove Windows 8.0 would entail removing
Github user brodybits closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/68
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user brodybits closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/69
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-medic/pull/44
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/86
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Okay fair enough. I was hoping that with the lack of tools release to
stable, we can rename without affecting end users *right now*, but not
*soon*.
If we never want to use scopes, fair enough. If we ever do, it will only
get more difficult.
-Michal
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Andrew
GitHub user nikhilkh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/138
CB-8485 Support for creating signed archive for iOS
Allows the user to specify the provisioning profile and the signing
identity using the command line and a build.json file.
You can merge
Support for iOS is in this PR now:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-ios/pull/138
It allows you to specify a signing identity and a provisioning profile using
command line arguments or build.json.
Thanks,
Nikhil
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal
Github user thehuijb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-camera/pull/83#issuecomment-94953716
alright, rebased to master, should be only my changes now.
sorry about that, it still git's me sometimes
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Joe, perhaps that can be part of the Tools Release blog post? Steve
put out a link to the draft in another thread.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
Resurrecting this thread!
I think we need to let our users know that Cordova 4.0 doesn't support
Github user shazron commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/4#issuecomment-94920959
If you could paste it in (only the relevant parts), that will be great.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Tools and plugins have been released.
Includes fetching from npm and renamed plugins.
Plugins:
http://cordova.apache.org/announcements/2015/04/21/plugins-release-and-move-to-npm.html
Tools: http://cordova.apache.org/news/2015/04/21/tools-release.html
Tweets:
Github user gmbad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/73#issuecomment-94990412
dpolivy,
maybe in new version 1.0.0 (Apr 15, 2015), its ok. No?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user stevengill commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/73#issuecomment-94991229
This didn't get reviewed for 1.0.0 release but will review it so it makes
the next one
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
I've sent a PR to update platform guides as per discussion in a separate
thread; it will be great if we can review and include it to docs release
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/279
Thx!
Sergey
-Original Message-
From: Steven Gill [mailto:stevengil...@gmail.com]
Sent:
Github user gmbad commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-file-transfer/pull/73#issuecomment-94999385
Well, while the correction is not published, i did an upload via base64
scheme for windows phone . If anyone is interested, contact me ...
---
If
Query - the blog listing on the home page isn't updated. Is that a known issue?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Tools and plugins have been released.
Includes fetching from npm and renamed plugins.
Plugins:
It should be, I see it?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:12 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Query - the blog listing on the home page isn't updated. Is that a known
issue?
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 5:46 PM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Tools and plugins have been
GitHub user stevengill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/72
Fixed dist-tag command
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/stevengill/cordova-coho patch-35
Alternatively you can review
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/72
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/71
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Hi All,
Mobile-spec has no 3.7.x branch, how can I get the plugin lists for
cordova-android 3.7.x, and how to build mobile-spec to test cordova-android
3.7.x, do we use the latest cordova-plugin-test-framework, cordova-cli,
cordova-mobile-spec and so on.
Thanks,
Junwei.
I'm going to look into doing this. Any blockers, let me know
Don't believe we have to vote on this one.
GitHub user stevengill opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-coho/pull/71
Added npm publish step to plugins release
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/stevengill/cordova-coho patch-34
Github user Hirbod commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/4#issuecomment-94870732
@shazron,
it seems like the Google Maps Plugin cause this error:
https://github.com/wf9a5m75/phonegap-googlemaps-plugin
The plugin
Github user Hirbod commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-plugin-statusbar/pull/4#issuecomment-94876888
At least it seems that
https://github.com/j-mcnally/cordova-statusTap/blob/master/src/ios/TapToScroll.m
is doing something right which doenst get
Resurrecting this thread!
I think we need to let our users know that Cordova 4.0 doesn't support
Gingerbread, or at least some of the features don't work on Gingerbread.
I've been trying to clean up the JIRA a bit today, and it seems that while
we came to a consensus to drop 2.3, we didn't tell
the npm team has granted us the cordova org/scope when/if we're ready for
it.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:37 AM, Michal Mocny mmo...@chromium.org wrote:
Okay fair enough. I was hoping that with the lack of tools release to
stable, we can rename without affecting end users *right now*, but not
45 matches
Mail list logo
