[DISCUSS] cordova-ios 6.0.0 Major Release

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
Does anyone have any reason to delay a cordova-ios major release (6.0.0)? Any additional outstanding changes to land? If not, I will start the release process in the next couple of days. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[DISCUSS] cordova-create 3.0.0 Major Release

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
Does anyone have any reason to delay a cordova-create major release (3.0.0)? Any additional outstanding changes to land? If not, I will start the release process in the next couple of days. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

[DISCUSS] cordova-common 4.0.1 Patch Release

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
Does anyone have any reason to delay a cordova-common patch release (4.0.1)? Any additional outstanding changes to land? If not, I will start the release process in the next couple of days. - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
@Jan I also recall that there were push back, in the past, because of write access to the repo's source code. I felt like that was related to another bot that did the same thing but I don't recall. If these were the same bots, I believe they updated their permission requirements. When I preping

Nightly build #1386 for cordova has succeeded!

2020-04-17 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
Nightly build #1386 for cordova has succeeded! The latest nightly has been published and you can try it out with 'npm i -g cordova@nightly' For details check build console at https://builds.apache.org/job/cordova-nightly/1386/consoleFull - Jenkins for Apache Cordova

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread Jan Piotrowski
I think in the past we also got pushback from INFRA on using bots via apps because of access to data etc (similar to CI services etc). Not sure if that changed in the last few months. J Am Fr., 17. Apr. 2020 um 13:44 Uhr schrieb Niklas Merz : > > I think I have to agree there. > > I would vote

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread Niklas Merz
I think I have to agree there. I would vote -0 for stale locking. This is really a mixed bag. As a user this annoyed me in some projects that issues are closed and locked but are discussing exactly my problem. Marking as stale or wontfix should be a good idea. But locking them could be a

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread julio cesar sanchez
I'm -1 for the stale bot, I've seen in other repos and it just ends closing valid issues and PRs because the maintainers didn't have time to look into them, but that's maintainers "fault" and I think it "punish" users. I'm +1 for the other ones. El vie., 17 abr. 2020 a las 12:43, Bryan Ellis ()

Re: [PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
I forgot to link PR: https://github.com/apache/cordova/pull/210 This PR contains the configurations for the apps described previously. On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 7:42 PM Bryan Ellis wrote: > I would like to better improve our GitHub issue tracker by adding some of > the Probot apps that can be

[PROPOSAL] Enable Probot Apps to Improve Issue Tracker

2020-04-17 Thread Bryan Ellis
I would like to better improve our GitHub issue tracker by adding some of the Probot apps that can be installed to GitHub. There are many available apps and I wanted to start off with a selected few that would help mitigate some of the tedious tasks. The apps I would like to bring up in this