Re: 3.0.0 as a beta release?

Unfortunately, any .0 release of PhoneGap/Cordova in the past had major bugs and hick ups for me, so my policy is to wait for the (obligatory) .1 release. I would welcome it a lot if we could be a little more humble about the releases and call it a beta, release the beta officially and see what pro

Re: Plugin packages on Android

What or where exactly is the deprecation policy? It's probably not semver, because breaking changes need a major version update in semver. Hence, breaking these plugins would require 4.0, not 3.1. But I guess this is just not how you have set it up. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 1:1

Re: Post 3.0 release committer and community meeting

Count me in for the hangouts etc. On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Ken Wallis wrote: > Definitely a good idea. > > Sent from my BlackBerry 10 smartphone. > From: Brian LeRoux > Sent: Monday, July 15, 2013 5:45 PM > To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org > Subject: Post 3

Re: killing github.com/phonegap/phonegap-plugins

What about support for 2.x? They'll still need plugins. — Sent from mobile On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 11:49 PM, Brian LeRoux wrote: > For sure, tho I think the other package mgmt ecosystem have > demonstrated that the good stuff naturally rises to the top and, I'd > assume, diligent use of will hel

Re: CDVLogger went away in master

I'd remove it from the core but have the resulting plugin installed by default. This way you have best of both worlds, the pragmatist's default and the purist's minimalism. — Sent from mobile On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Steven Gill wrote: > +1 to making it a platform dependency and keepin