You created and merged
https://github.com/apache/cordova-contribute/pull/32 which contains
wrong information. Please undo it.
One random example where the previously existing `question` label is
missing as it was renamed to `info-needed` which does not match the
>20 issues and PRs it was used
I have changed the "query" labels back to "question". I continue to
think we should avoid using the "question" label since I have seen it
used for both real questions and cases where more information is
needed from the OP.
Here are the "question" issues on all of our repos:
*
I am now changing the "query" labels back to "question", though under
protest. I did already check that the new "info-needed" label is used
where it looked appropriate. But I don't see what documentation
changes have to be "undone".
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 5:57 AM Jan Piotrowski wrote:
>
>
Chris, it has been another week and I still see `query` issue labels
that should be `question`, and I have to assume some are also still
`info needed` and thus used in a conflicting way to their previous
usage. Documentation changes are also not undone.
Please finally undo this.
-J
Am Mi., 24.
Chris, it has been over a week. What is the state of undoing the label
and documentation changes?
-J
Am Mi., 17. Juli 2019 um 20:08 Uhr schrieb Jan Piotrowski
:
>
> By renaming the label, you also renamed it for all existing issues.
> Now many labels that were just questions of users (both open
By renaming the label, you also renamed it for all existing issues.
Now many labels that were just questions of users (both open and
closed) indicate that info is needed - which might be true or not.
Please undo all renaming of labels, both to `info-needed` and `query`.
Please undo the changes to
This work was not done 100% correctly, please accept my apologies.
I will try to explain why it was not done 100% correctly so we can
decide what we want to do next.
In general, I have found the standard “question” label to be confusing
since different repos in the wild, including Cordova repos,
I think this is an Excellent idea.
Thanks and Best Regards
> On Jul 15, 2019, at 11:07 PM, Chris Brody wrote:
>
> We receive a number of support issues where I think we need an
> explicit label such as “info needed”, to make it clear that more
> information is needed before we can provide any
+1 Makes sense.
On Tuesday, July 16, 2019, Chris Brody wrote:
> We receive a number of support issues where I think we need an
> explicit label such as “info needed”, to make it clear that more
> information is needed before we can provide any support. I think we
> need to add this label to a
+1 on Janpio comment, I feel that "query" can actually bring more confusion
behind what it means. I think "question" is more preferred.
I do not see how the two tags "question" and "info-needed" would create
confusion between each other. A user asks a question will always get the
"question" tag,
Yeah, that was wrong.
- "question" classifies an issue into a category: bug, feature,
enhancement, support, discussion, question
- "info-needed" is just a tag similar to "invalid" or "has-pr"
Please stop rolling this out to other repositories.
Please revert the change to the "Default labels"
Looks good to me.
>
> On Jul 15, 2019 at 4:59 PM, mailto:chris.br...@gmail.com)>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> So far I renamed question -> info needed in the following (if I recall
> correctly):
>
> * apache/cordova
> * cordova-common
> *
I will also rename question to query in cases whenever that label was
used for Q This *should* avoid confusion between Q and
info-needed cases.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 5:59 PM Chris Brody wrote:
>
> So far I renamed question -> info needed in the following (if I recall
> correctly):
>
> *
So far I renamed question -> info needed in the following (if I recall
correctly):
* apache/cordova
* cordova-common
* cordova-lib
* cordova-android
* cordova-ios
and raised https://github.com/apache/cordova-contribute/pull/32
I will go through the other repos in
For JIRA I think we agreed to close after 2 weeks with no response. Users
can reopen if they provide the info later.
El El lun, 15 jul 2019 a las 23:18, Darryl Pogue
escribió:
> +1
>
> Might also be worth proposing a rule that issues tagged “info needed” get
> closed after X days if there is no
feature creep!
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:20 PM Tim Brust wrote:
> Installing the Stale bot is probably not possible I guess?
>
> > On 15. Jul 2019, at 23:18, Darryl Pogue wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Might also be worth proposing a rule that issues tagged “info needed” get
> > closed after X days
Installing the Stale bot is probably not possible I guess?
> On 15. Jul 2019, at 23:18, Darryl Pogue wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Might also be worth proposing a rule that issues tagged “info needed” get
> closed after X days if there is no information provided. We have a bunch of
> issues piling up that
The nice thing about missing process is that one can do whatever one wants ;)
+1
Bonus points if you add it to
https://github.com/apache/cordova-contribute/blob/master/github-labels.md#custom-labels
and give it a nice vibrant color.
Am Mo., 15. Juli 2019 um 23:18 Uhr schrieb Darryl Pogue :
>
>
+1
Might also be worth proposing a rule that issues tagged “info needed” get
closed after X days if there is no information provided. We have a bunch of
issues piling up that are all waiting for info, and we have no process that
allows us to close those.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:11 PM Jesse
+1 I don't think you'll see any objections.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:07 PM Chris Brody wrote:
> We receive a number of support issues where I think we need an
> explicit label such as “info needed”, to make it clear that more
> information is needed before we can provide any support. I think
We receive a number of support issues where I think we need an
explicit label such as “info needed”, to make it clear that more
information is needed before we can provide any support. I think we
need to add this label to a number of repos such as apache/cordova,
cordova-android, cordova-ios, etc.
21 matches
Mail list logo
