Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-27 Thread Shazron
+1 On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 11:07 AM, Joe Bowser wrote: > OK, I got everything I wanted in the release in. It's relatively future > proof for the time being on Linux and Windows, and Alexander's last minute > fix was a good catch (although I'm not sure why an earlier check

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-27 Thread Joe Bowser
OK, I got everything I wanted in the release in. It's relatively future proof for the time being on Linux and Windows, and Alexander's last minute fix was a good catch (although I'm not sure why an earlier check didn't work on Windows, and that bothers me a little, but not enough to vote against

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-21 Thread Darryl Pogue
I have tested locally and it works when adding the platform and running prepare, with the following cases. Existing src to target: works Existing src to target in new directory: works Nonexisting src to target: Error (consistent with icon/splash tags) There aren't any unit tests, but there don't

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-21 Thread Jesse
So do we need to wait for anything to get the resource-file work in? How well tested is it? Do you feel confident that it will not delay the overall release? I would really like to see a release out sooner rather than later, as things are broken right now. [1] [2] [1]

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-20 Thread Filip Maj
I am all for a new release, to get compatibiltiy with the latest SDK tooling out ASAP. No objections here. On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:36 PM, Joe Bowser wrote: > Hey > > Does anyone have any reason to delay Cordova-Android 6.2.0? I want to get a > release out to address the

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-20 Thread julio cesar sanchez
+1 to adding resource-file and release 6.2.0 El lunes, 20 de marzo de 2017, Darryl Pogue escribió: > Not a reason to delay, but if there are no objections then I'd like to > get the config.xml resource-file [1] support merged in for this > release. The required version of

Re: [DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-20 Thread Darryl Pogue
Not a reason to delay, but if there are no objections then I'd like to get the config.xml resource-file [1] support merged in for this release. The required version of cordova-common is bundled now, and this would cut down on one of the very common user pain points where hooks are required for

[DISCUSS] Cordova-Android 6.2.0 Release

2017-03-20 Thread Joe Bowser
Hey Does anyone have any reason to delay Cordova-Android 6.2.0? I want to get a release out to address the problems people are having with the latest Android Tools. There's also a multipart fix that I want to get into the release if possible. If there's no objections, I'll start the release