sgtm!
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky dblot...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often
goes out of date and we end up with a lot of noise in coho
audit-license-headers”. Do you think it would be a good idea to
+1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Steven Gill stevengil...@gmail.com wrote:
Do it!
On Jun 1, 2015 7:28 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
sgtm!
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky dblot...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Do it!
On Jun 1, 2015 7:28 AM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
sgtm!
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Dmitry Blotsky dblot...@microsoft.com
wrote:
Hi all,
Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often
goes out of date and we end up with a lot of
Hi all,
Right now coho stores rat excludes inside its source code, which often goes out
of date and we end up with a lot of noise in coho audit-license-headers”. Do
you think it would be a good idea to instead add a “.ratignore” file in each
repo, much like .npmignore and .gitignore?
Kindly,
