-Original Message-
From: agri...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew
Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:48 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Left some comments on the PR.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
-Original Message-
From: Nikhil Khandelwal [mailto:nikhi...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:37 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build signed archives using CLI
Thanks, Andrew for doing a thorough review. This was merged in last week.
I have created a new PR
...@microsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, April 6, 2015 9:37 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build signed archives using CLI
Thanks, Andrew for doing a thorough review. This was merged in last week. I
have created a new PR for the docs update:
https://github.com/apache/cordova-docs/pull/277
It's important
...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:48 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Left some comments on the PR.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi...@microsoft.com
wrote:
I just submitted a PR
[mailto:csantan...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 2:28 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Thanks Nikhil I see this as a very good and important feature to have in
our CLI stack
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Nikhil Khandelwal nikhi
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I'm leaning to Andrew and Omar's idea. I like the idea of having a
file where all the platform-specific information will be stored, then
each platform will take that information to sign the archive and
produce a usable, I mean ready-to-distribute
: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:30 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build signed archives using CLI
Yeah personally I am thinking that - particularly if we treat
platforms as dependencies in package.json as proposed - we'll need
some facility to set native build settings. We may
[mailto:sosah.vic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 2:29 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I'm leaning to Andrew and Omar's idea. I like the idea of having a file where
all the platform-specific information will be stored, then each platform
@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build signed archives using CLI
Yeah personally I am thinking that - particularly if we treat platforms as
dependencies in package.json as proposed - we'll need some facility to set
native build settings. We may be able to come up with some sort of
abstraction
...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:18 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Sounds good, let's wait until Dan is back to discuss. The main point I'd like
to cover is whether it'd be good to have layer
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
To: dev@cordova.apache.org dev@cordova.apache.org
+1 on having a new command cordova package this will allow IBM tooling
to
hook into before_package and after_package for our own customizations
(direct update, authenticity, etc..)
+1
in this area.
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Victor Sosa [mailto:sosah.vic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:57 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Hi Andrew.
AFAICT, no one has done any work on this area, but I'd like to add this topic
-Original Message-
From: Victor Sosa [mailto:sosah.vic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:57 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Hi Andrew.
AFAICT, no one has done any work on this area, but I'd like to add this
topic
: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:57 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Hi Andrew.
AFAICT, no one has done any work on this area, but I'd like to add this
topic to the hangout agenda, start discussing this. I think Subhag has a
very good design
in this
area.
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Victor Sosa [mailto:sosah.vic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 7:57 AM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Hi Andrew.
AFAICT, no one has done any work on this area, but I'd like
...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 10:18 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
Sounds good, let's wait until Dan is back to discuss. The main point I'd like
to cover is whether it'd be good to have layer of indirection between cordova
/1tJQ9OoGrrMhZcLI3mg46rGzAfbiQu9PuNBL1auAMGFM/edit?usp=sharing
-- Forwarded message --
From: Carlos Santana csantan...@gmail.com
Date: 2014-10-15 12:42 GMT-05:00
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
To: dev@cordova.apache.org dev@cordova.apache.org
+1 on having a new
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
To: dev@cordova.apache.org dev@cordova.apache.org
+1 on having a new command cordova package this will allow IBM tooling to
hook into before_package and after_package for our own customizations
(direct update, authenticity, etc..)
+1 on using sane defaults
To: Shazron
Cc: tommy-carlos williams; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
For Android Gradle, what's in (and experimental) right now:
Environment variable RELEASE_SIGNING_PROPERTIES_FILE points to a
.properties file that contains:
storeFile=relative/path
(what Soak mentions in the { }).
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Frederico Galvão [mailto:frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:33 AM
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned
-
From: Frederico Galvão [mailto:frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:33 AM
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned, but as far as I know
cordova is trying it's best to not depend
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned, but as far as I know
cordova is trying it's best to not depend on anything to be in
/platforms/TARGET_PLATFORM/. Having said that, the package command
should
always expect things
...@pontoget.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:33 AM
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned, but as far as I know
cordova is trying it's best to not depend on anything to be in
/platforms
in the { }).
-Chuck
-Original Message-
From: Frederico Galvão [mailto:frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:33 AM
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything
@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned, but as far as I know
cordova is trying it's best to not depend on anything to be in
/platforms/TARGET_PLATFORM/. Having said that, the package command
should
always
-
From: Frederico Galvão [mailto:frederico.gal...@pontoget.com.br]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 10:33 AM
Cc: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
I agree with pretty much everything mentioned, but as far as I
know cordova is trying it's best
: Subhag Oak [mailto:subhag@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 9, 2014 12:58 PM
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: RE: Build signed archives using CLI
Adding to what Shazron said, isn't config.xml supposed to be considered as
app-wide settings/properties? Typically packaging information
their
apps
to
the store.
-Original Message-
From: Josh Soref [mailto:jso...@blackberry.com]
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 12:46 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate
...@google.com [mailto:agri...@google.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Grieve
Sent: Wednesday, October 8, 2014 4:40 AM
To: Shazron
Cc: tommy-carlos williams; dev@cordova.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
For Android Gradle, what's in (and experimental) right now:
Environment variable
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate a signed image...
On 10/6/14, 3:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
AFAIK, I don't think there's any technical roadblocks. Just need
[mailto:jso...@blackberry.com]
Sent: Monday, October 6, 2014 12:46 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate a signed image...
On 10/6/14, 3:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote
Hi community.
Been looking at this topic and wondering why the build command does not
create signed archives. Digging a little bit found a lot of differences in
the platforms to create these archives.
For instance, in Android you need to
1. Export your APK in release mode (--release flag)
2.
AFAIK, I don't think there's any technical roadblocks. Just need a proposal
for how it should look, and then a patch docs to add it!
For Android's hot-off-the-press gradle support, you can set an environment
variable that points to a .properties file for signing builds. This shows
one way to go
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate a signed image...
On 10/6/14, 3:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
AFAIK, I don't think there's any technical roadblocks. Just need a
proposal
for how it should look, and then a patch docs to add it!
For
signed archives using CLI
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate a signed image...
On 10/6/14, 3:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
AFAIK, I don't think there's any technical roadblocks. Just need a
proposal for how it should look
12:46 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: Build signed archives using CLI
if you do:
Cordova build --release,
The blackberry10 platform will generate a signed image...
On 10/6/14, 3:18 PM, Andrew Grieve agri...@chromium.org wrote:
AFAIK, I don't think there's any technical roadblocks. Just need
36 matches
Mail list logo
