Okay—I'll commit the reversion. Jesse will investigate another approach to
eliminating document.write; Jesse, let me know if you have something else
to try and I'll run it on the offending device.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jesse wrote:
> Yes, there is a restriction against writing scrip
Yes, reverting 8b1fd7d49c278d43b34b4c041f1575a1a39a664d fixes the issue.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Jesse wrote:
> Yes, there is a restriction against writing scripts with document.write in
> Windows8 for Windows Store Apps.
> + I think that the proper way via createElement.
> If you thin
Yes, there is a restriction against writing scripts with document.write in
Windows8 for Windows Store Apps.
+ I think that the proper way via createElement.
If you think it is better to just revert my change, that is fine, but I
think it points to another latent bug that is requiring a specific loa
I'll take a look at whether reverting this change fixes the issue. If so,
I'll also wait for Jesse to chime in before doing anything else with it.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Joe Bowser wrote:
> I think it was made because document.write is ugly. That being said,
> does this break somethi
It may be ugly, but the change certainly changes the semantics of the code.
With document.write, the script is guaranteed to be loaded before the next
script tag is evaluated. There's no guarantee with dynamic injection.
I saw similar not-redrawing bugs when I was playing with the bridge modes.
Sp
I think it was made because document.write is ugly. That being said,
does this break something for WP? Seriously, adding a script tag
shouldn't cause the browser to not redraw, but I've seen stranger.
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Andrew Grieve wrote:
> Might have been this change:
> https://
Might have been this change:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cordova-mobile-spec.git;a=blobdiff;f=cordova-incl.js;h=458e10a7155d812d084720f7082c4aa1c63f44c8;hp=c624996236eb2c7501714b48206c0b085460317a;hb=8b1fd7d49c278d43b34b4c041f1575a1a39a664d;hpb=ae18f3ea59d0b53880644ef8f8dcc3d0ade6f76d
Well I just suck. Please ignore me and dont sidetrack the original
question!
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Michal Mocny wrote:
> [private reply]
>
> Didn't want to sidetrack the discussion, but im curious about your
> chromebook workflow.. are you doing full local dev using crouton, using
[private reply]
Didn't want to sidetrack the discussion, but im curious about your
chromebook workflow.. are you doing full local dev using crouton, using a
remote connection, or something like phonegap build using local environment
just for text editing?
And which machine are you using?
Thanks.
Hey
While I was setting up my environment on the Chromebook for JSConf, I
noticed that I ran into the Android 4.0.3 bug again. It seems that
when I was testing 4.0.3 last, I was using an old mobile-spec. After
going through the project, it seems that the changes that were made to
mobile-spec bre
10 matches
Mail list logo
