Re: CommandProxy and misbehaving plugins

2013-10-29 Thread Lorin Beer
ah, I misunderstood Gord's post. Yes, this would be a welcome solution to this. +1. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Bryan Higgins wrote: > Lorin - with Gord's generic command proxy vibrate would still execute > within the main content webview > > I'm in favour of using this. > > > On Tue, Oct

Re: CommandProxy and misbehaving plugins

2013-10-29 Thread Bryan Higgins
Lorin - with Gord's generic command proxy vibrate would still execute within the main content webview I'm in favour of using this. On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Lorin Beer wrote: > Hey Gord, > > handling Vibrate behind the exec layer was attempted, but unfortunately > exec calls occur in a s

Re: CommandProxy and misbehaving plugins

2013-10-29 Thread Lorin Beer
Hey Gord, handling Vibrate behind the exec layer was attempted, but unfortunately exec calls occur in a separate webview, and the call to vibrate isn't executed. We've talked about a few ways around this, and a jira ticket would be appreciated. - Lorin On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Jesse w

Re: CommandProxy and misbehaving plugins

2013-10-29 Thread Jesse
Welcome back! Yeah, I chose to make windows8 run the exact same js as the other devices, and strove for a consistent exec signature. This was the initial goal of having a cordova-js in the first place. When I saw firefoxos requiring the same kind of functionality, I suggested they use the same cla

CommandProxy and misbehaving plugins

2013-10-28 Thread Gord Tanner
Hey everyone, Long time no commit but I was working on getting cordova 3.X support working in ripple (really really close and about to release it) but I saw some weird stuff in some of the plugins. In the vibration plugin the base javascript calls into the cordova exec module [1] and does all the