+1
Sent from my phone.
___
Kerri
> On Jun 29, 2017, at 13:34, Joe Bowser wrote:
>
> Hey
>
> I think we should accept this PR to attract newer developers. Sure, we
> could adopt Java 8, but I think being stuck with Java 6 may be limiting
>
+1
@purplecabbage
risingj.com
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 12:34 PM, Simon MacDonald wrote:
> +1
>
> As per: https://developer.android.com/guide/platform/j8-jack.html
>
> We can keep the source and target versions set to 1.7 and still use the
> subset of new Java 8
+1
As per: https://developer.android.com/guide/platform/j8-jack.html
We can keep the source and target versions set to 1.7 and still use the
subset of new Java 8 features if uses compile using JDK 8. Perhaps the
readme should be updated to require JDK 8?
Simon Mac Donald
+1
El 29 jun. 2017 8:34 p. m., "Joe Bowser" escribió:
> Hey
>
> I think we should accept this PR to attract newer developers. Sure, we
> could adopt Java 8, but I think being stuck with Java 6 may be limiting
> contributions. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
>
Hey
I think we should accept this PR to attract newer developers. Sure, we
could adopt Java 8, but I think being stuck with Java 6 may be limiting
contributions. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
https://github.com/apache/cordova-android/pull/380