Adding * by default SGTM. Having separate debug/release whitelists sounds
dangerous though. You don't want your app to work in debug mode and then be
broken when you release it.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
I confirm that Android also uses config.xml.
Yeah, it's something we take care with in our implementation. Primarily, we
use the separation to include things wholesale in Debug that we don't want
in Release, such as TestFlight, and other performance gathering code that
is disabled in release builds.
On Tuesday, November 6, 2012, Andrew
We've had the discussion. So what is the decision/consensus? Leave as is,
or add * to default settings for all, with a warning in the console log?
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Joe Bowser bows...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
Echoing
I guess the consensus is to whitelist everything (*) all the time.
My opinion is that there should be some dev mode where (*) is set and then
a release mode where you'd specify your hosts.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Shazron shaz...@gmail.com wrote:
We've had the discussion. So what is
I have relaxed my position, as I can work around whatever the choice is.
It might be prudent to ask our users though.
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Anis KADRI anis.ka...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess the consensus is to whitelist everything (*) all the time.
My opinion is that there should be
white lists everything. We don't do
that in WebWorks ;)
From: Steven Gill
To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Reply To: dev@cordova.apache.org
Re: Whitelist defaults
2012-11-01 10:30:42 PM
+1 to point it out in the getting started guides.
On Nov 1, 2012 6:35 PM, Marcel Kinard wrote
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Lorin Beer lorin.beer@gmail.com wrote:
BriBri Say
This is off topic, but I think this is the first time I've seen Brian
called this on the list.
Yup agree it should whitelist nothing but it also needs to be very clear in
the log when we block a request that it's due to the whitelist.
On Thursday, November 1, 2012, Shazron wrote:
I concur with Kevin. It won't be much of a whitelist if no one uses it -- I
would argue that if you set it
