Re: Should we change default camera quality?

I already changed it to match the docs long time ago, that's not the topic I want to discuss. This topic is to discuss what Nikhil said about if it still makes sense to set the default quality to 50. Scott made a good point too 2016-06-27 0:32 GMT+02:00 Simon MacDonald

Re: Should we change default camera quality?

+1 to change it to match the docs. Mind you it already is set to 50 in the JS code so it's really a no-op that it is 80 in the Java code. Simon Mac Donald http://hi.im/simonmacdonald On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Scott Bradshaw wrote: > Hi, > > I've recently been

Re: Should we change default camera quality?

Hi, I've recently been working on a rotation fix for the camera plugin for Android. There are many variables with the camera plugin and you only described two (quality and destination type). On Android, the reality is a new bitmap has to be created if a user specifies any of the following:

Should we change default camera quality?

Some time ago I opened this issue to set android default quality to 50 on the java code (it was really 50 because it was already set on the javascript part, so the default java value won´t take effect) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-11269 But Nikhil commented on the issue and I think